Русский 
Deutsch 
Português 
Italiano 
Français 
日本語 
Español 
Polski 
简体中文 
한국어 
Differences
Top features of AMD FX-9830P
-
Higher clock speed3.00 GHz
2.40 GHz
Around -25% better clock speed -
Performance per watt35 W
38 W
About 1.09 0.97 times less performance per watt
Top features of Intel Atom C5315
Specifications
Complete list of technical specificationsCPU generation and family
Let's find out which one of AMD FX-9830P and Intel Atom C5315 is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Name |
AMD FX-9830P
Intel Atom C5315
|
| Family |
AMD FX
Intel Atom
|
| CPU group |
AMD FX-9800
Intel Atom CE5300
|
| Segment |
Mobile
Mobile
|
| Generation |
4
3
|
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
In this block we are going to compare AMD FX-9830P vs Intel Atom C5315 by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads |
4 / 4
4 / 4
|
| Core architecture |
normal
normal
|
| Cores |
4x
4x
|
| Hyperthreading / SMT |
No
No
|
| Overclocking |
No
No
|
| Frequency |
3.00 GHz
2.40 GHz
|
| Turbo Frequency (1 Core) |
3.70 GHz
--
|
| Turbo Frequency (4 Cores) |
3.40 GHz
--
|
Internal Graphics
Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in AMD FX-9830P and Intel Atom C5315 along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| GPU name |
AMD Radeon R7 - 512 (Bristol Ridge)
no iGPU
|
| GPU frequency |
0.90 GHz
|
| GPU (Turbo) |
No turbo
No turbo
|
| Execution units |
8
|
| Shader |
512
|
| Max. GPU Memory |
2 GB
--
|
| Max. displays |
2
|
| Generation |
6
|
| Direct X |
12
--
|
| Technology |
28 nm
|
| Release date |
Q2/2016
|
Hardware codec support
Let's compare the support of video codecs between AMD FX-9830P and Intel Atom C5315. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| h265 / HEVC (8 bit) |
No
No
|
| h265 / HEVC (10 bit) |
No
No
|
| h264 |
Decode
No
|
| VP8 |
No
No
|
| VP9 |
No
No
|
| AV1 |
No
No
|
| AVC |
Decode
No
|
| VC-1 |
Decode
No
|
| JPEG |
Decode / Encode
No
|
Memory & PCIe
To choose the best model between AMD FX-9830P and Intel Atom C5315 you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Memory type |
DDR4-2400
DDR4-2400
|
| Max. Memory |
64 GB
256 GB
|
| Memory channels |
2 (Dual Channel)
2 (Dual Channel)
|
| Bandwidth |
38.4 GB/s
--
|
| ECC |
No
Yes
|
| PCIe |
3.0 x 8
3 x 12
|
| AES-NI |
Yes
Yes
|
Thermal Management
Let's find out what TDP value would be better for AMD FX-9830P or Intel Atom C5315? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| TDP (PL1) |
35 W
38 W
|
| TDP up |
45 W
--
|
| TDP down |
25 W
--
|
| Tjunction max. |
90 \xc2\xb0C
100 \xc2\xb0C
|
Technical details
Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for AMD FX-9830P and Intel Atom C5315 CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Technology |
28 nm
32 nm
|
| Chip design |
Monolithic
|
| Socket |
FP4
BGA 2106
|
| L2-Cache |
2.00 MB
9.00 MB
|
| Architecture |
Excavator (Bristol Ridge)
Berryville
|
| Virtualization |
AMD-V
Unknown
|
| Instruction set (ISA) |
x86-64 (64 bit)
x86-64 (64 bit)
|
| ISA extensions |
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, FMA4
Unknown
|
| Release date |
Q2/2016
Q2/2022
|
