Differences

Top features of AMD EPYC 9654

Top features of Intel Core i5-13400T
-
Performance per watt35 W
360 W
About 0.1 times less performance per watt
Specifications
Complete list of technical specificationsCPU generation and family
Let's find out which one of AMD EPYC 9654 and Intel Core i5-13400T is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.
Specification | Value |
---|---|
Name |
AMD EPYC 9654
![]() |
Family |
AMD EPYC
![]() |
CPU group |
AMD EPYC 9004
![]() |
Segment |
Desktop / Server
![]() |
Generation |
4
![]() |
Predecessor |
--
![]() |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
In this block we are going to compare AMD EPYC 9654 vs Intel Core i5-13400T by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.
Specification | Value |
---|---|
CPU Cores / Threads |
96 / 192
![]() |
Core architecture |
normal
![]() |
Hyperthreading / SMT |
Yes
![]() |
Overclocking |
No
![]() |
Internal Graphics
Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in AMD EPYC 9654 and Intel Core i5-13400T along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.
Specification | Value |
---|---|
GPU name |
no iGPU
![]() |
GPU frequency |
![]() |
GPU (Turbo) |
No turbo
![]() |
Execution units |
![]() |
Shader |
![]() |
Max. GPU Memory |
--
![]() |
Max. displays |
![]() |
Generation |
![]() |
Direct X |
--
![]() |
Technology |
![]() |
Release date |
![]() |
Hardware codec support
Let's compare the support of video codecs between AMD EPYC 9654 and Intel Core i5-13400T. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.
Specification | Value |
---|---|
h265 / HEVC (8 bit) |
No
![]() |
h265 / HEVC (10 bit) |
No
![]() |
h264 |
No
![]() |
VP8 |
No
![]() |
VP9 |
No
![]() |
AV1 |
No
![]() |
AVC |
No
![]() |
VC-1 |
No
![]() |
JPEG |
No
![]() |
Memory & PCIe
To choose the best model between AMD EPYC 9654 and Intel Core i5-13400T you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.
Specification | Value |
---|---|
Memory type |
DDR5-4800
![]() |
Max. Memory |
6144 GB
![]() |
Memory channels |
12
![]() |
Bandwidth |
461.0 GB/s
![]() |
ECC |
Yes
![]() |
PCIe |
5.0 x 128
![]() |
AES-NI |
Yes
![]() |
Thermal Management
Let's find out what TDP value would be better for AMD EPYC 9654 or Intel Core i5-13400T? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.
Specification | Value |
---|---|
TDP (PL1) |
360 W
![]() |
TDP (PL2) |
--
![]() |
TDP up |
400 W
![]() |
TDP down |
320 W
![]() |
Tjunction max. |
100 \xc2\xb0C
![]() |
Technical details
Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for AMD EPYC 9654 and Intel Core i5-13400T CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.
Specification | Value |
---|---|
Technology |
5 nm
![]() |
Chip design |
Chiplet
![]() |
Socket |
SP5
![]() |
L2-Cache |
96.00 MB
![]() |
L3-Cache |
384.00 MB
![]() |
Architecture |
Genoa (Zen 4)
![]() |
Operating systems |
Windows Server 2022, Linux, Windows 11
![]() |
Virtualization |
AMD-V, SVM
![]() |
Instruction set (ISA) |
x86-64 (64 bit)
![]() |
ISA extensions |
SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512, BFLOAT16, VNNI
![]() |
Release date |
Q4/2022
![]() |
Release price |
11805 $
![]() |
Part Number |
100-000000789
![]() |
Documents |
Technical data sheet
![]() |