Русский 
Deutsch 
Português 
Italiano 
Français 
日本語 
Español 
Polski 
简体中文 
한국어 
Differences
Top features of MediaTek MT8321
-
Higher clock speed1.30 GHz
1.10 GHz
Around -18% better clock speed
Top features of Intel Celeron N4100
Specifications
Complete list of technical specificationsCPU generation and family
Let's find out which one of MediaTek MT8321 and Intel Celeron N4100 is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Name |
MediaTek MT8321
Intel Celeron N4100
|
| Family |
Mediatek MT-Serie
Intel Celeron
|
| CPU group |
MediaTek MT83xx A7
Intel Celeron J4000/N4000/N5000
|
| Segment |
Mobile
Mobile
|
| Generation |
1
9
|
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
In this block we are going to compare MediaTek MT8321 vs Intel Celeron N4100 by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Core architecture |
normal
normal
|
| Overclocking |
No
No
|
| Frequency |
1.30 GHz
1.10 GHz
|
Internal Graphics
Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in MediaTek MT8321 and Intel Celeron N4100 along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| GPU name |
ARM Mali-400
Intel UHD Graphics 600
|
| GPU frequency |
0.01 GHz
0.20 GHz
|
| GPU (Turbo) |
0.01 GHz
0.70 GHz
|
| Execution units |
1
12
|
| Shader |
16
96
|
| Max. GPU Memory |
--
8 GB
|
| Max. displays |
1
3
|
| Generation |
Utgard
9.5
|
| Technology |
28nm
14 nm
|
| Release date |
Q2/2008
Q4/2017
|
Hardware codec support
Let's compare the support of video codecs between MediaTek MT8321 and Intel Celeron N4100. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| h265 / HEVC (8 bit) |
No
Decode / Encode
|
| h265 / HEVC (10 bit) |
No
Decode / Encode
|
| h264 |
No
Decode / Encode
|
| VP8 |
No
Decode / Encode
|
| VP9 |
No
Decode / Encode
|
| AV1 |
No
No
|
| AVC |
No
Decode / Encode
|
| VC-1 |
No
Decode
|
| JPEG |
No
Decode / Encode
|
Memory & PCIe
To choose the best model between MediaTek MT8321 and Intel Celeron N4100 you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Max. Memory |
8 GB
|
| Memory channels |
0
2
|
| ECC |
No
No
|
Thermal Management
Let's find out what TDP value would be better for MediaTek MT8321 or Intel Celeron N4100? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| TDP (PL1) |
6 W
|
Technical details
Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for MediaTek MT8321 and Intel Celeron N4100 CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Technology |
28 nm
10 nm
|
| Socket |
N/A
BGA 1090
|
| L3-Cache |
--
4.00 MB
|
| Architecture |
Cortex-A7
Gemini Lake
|
| Virtualization |
None
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
|
| Instruction set (ISA) |
ARMv7-A32 (32 bit)
x86-64 (64 bit)
|
| ISA extensions |
SSE4.1, SSE4.2
|
| Release date |
Q2/2014
Q4/2017
|
