Русский 
Deutsch 
Português 
Italiano 
Français 
日本語 
Español 
Polski 
简体中文 
한국어 
Differences
Top features of MediaTek MT8321
Top features of AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
-
Higher clock speed2.60 GHz
1.30 GHz
Around 50% better clock speed
Specifications
Complete list of technical specificationsCPU generation and family
Let's find out which one of MediaTek MT8321 and AMD Ryzen 3 3250U is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Name |
MediaTek MT8321
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
|
| Family |
Mediatek MT-Serie
AMD Ryzen
|
| CPU group |
MediaTek MT83xx A7
AMD Ryzen 3000U
|
| Segment |
Mobile
Mobile
|
| Generation |
1
2
|
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
In this block we are going to compare MediaTek MT8321 vs AMD Ryzen 3 3250U by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Core architecture |
normal
normal
|
| Overclocking |
No
No
|
| Frequency |
1.30 GHz
2.60 GHz
|
Internal Graphics
Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in MediaTek MT8321 and AMD Ryzen 3 3250U along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| GPU name |
ARM Mali-400
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
|
| GPU frequency |
0.01 GHz
1.00 GHz
|
| GPU (Turbo) |
0.01 GHz
No turbo
|
| Execution units |
1
3
|
| Shader |
16
192
|
| Max. GPU Memory |
--
2 GB
|
| Max. displays |
1
3
|
| Generation |
Utgard
8
|
| Technology |
28nm
14 nm
|
| Release date |
Q2/2008
Q1/2018
|
Hardware codec support
Let's compare the support of video codecs between MediaTek MT8321 and AMD Ryzen 3 3250U. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| h265 / HEVC (8 bit) |
No
Decode / Encode
|
| h265 / HEVC (10 bit) |
No
Decode / Encode
|
| h264 |
No
Decode / Encode
|
| VP8 |
No
Decode / Encode
|
| VP9 |
No
Decode / Encode
|
| AV1 |
No
No
|
| AVC |
No
Decode / Encode
|
| VC-1 |
No
Decode
|
| JPEG |
No
Decode / Encode
|
Memory & PCIe
To choose the best model between MediaTek MT8321 and AMD Ryzen 3 3250U you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Max. Memory |
32 GB
|
| Memory channels |
0
2
|
| ECC |
No
Yes
|
Thermal Management
Let's find out what TDP value would be better for MediaTek MT8321 or AMD Ryzen 3 3250U? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| TDP (PL1) |
15 W
|
| TDP up |
--
25 W
|
| TDP down |
--
12 W
|
| Tjunction max. |
--
95 °C
|
Technical details
Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for MediaTek MT8321 and AMD Ryzen 3 3250U CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Technology |
28 nm
14 nm
|
| Socket |
N/A
FP5
|
| L3-Cache |
--
4.00 MB
|
| Architecture |
Cortex-A7
Dali (Zen+)
|
| Virtualization |
None
AMD-V, SVM
|
| Instruction set (ISA) |
ARMv7-A32 (32 bit)
x86-64 (64 bit)
|
| ISA extensions |
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
|
| Release date |
Q2/2014
Q1/2020
|
