Intel Atom Z3530
HiSilicon Kirin 928
Select graphics card
Select graphics card

Comparing HiSilicon Kirin 928 vs Intel Atom Z3530

Comparison of video cards HiSilicon Kirin 928 vs Intel Atom Z3530 in benchmarks and specifications.

Differences

Intel Atom Z3530

Top features of Intel Atom Z3530

Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    1.33 GHz left arrow 1.30 GHz
    Around -2% better clock speed
HiSilicon Kirin 928

Top features of HiSilicon Kirin 928

Report a bug

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications

CPU generation and family

Let's find out which one of Intel Atom Z3530 and HiSilicon Kirin 928 is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.

Specification Value
Name Intel Atom Z3530 left arrow HiSilicon Kirin 928
Family Intel Atom left arrow HiSilicon Kirin
CPU group Intel Atom Z3500 left arrow HiSilicon Kirin 920
Segment Mobile left arrow Mobile
Generation 5 left arrow 2

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In this block we are going to compare Intel Atom Z3530 vs HiSilicon Kirin 928 by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.

Specification Value
Core architecture normal left arrow hybrid (big.LITTLE)
Overclocking No left arrow No
Frequency 1.33 GHz left arrow 1.30 GHz

Internal Graphics

Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in Intel Atom Z3530 and HiSilicon Kirin 928 along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.

Specification Value
GPU name PowerVR G6430 left arrow ARM Mali-T628 MP4
GPU frequency 0.46 GHz left arrow 0.60 GHz
GPU (Turbo) No turbo left arrow 0.60 GHz
Execution units 16 left arrow 4
Shader 128 left arrow 64
Max. displays 2 left arrow 1
Generation left arrow Midgard 2
Technology 28 nm left arrow 32nm
Release date Q3/2013 left arrow Q4/2012

Hardware codec support

Let's compare the support of video codecs between Intel Atom Z3530 and HiSilicon Kirin 928. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.

Specification Value
h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No left arrow No
h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No left arrow No
h264 No left arrow Decode / Encode
VP8 No left arrow Decode / Encode
VP9 No left arrow No
AV1 No left arrow No
AVC No left arrow No
VC-1 No left arrow No
JPEG No left arrow No

Memory & PCIe

To choose the best model between Intel Atom Z3530 and HiSilicon Kirin 928 you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.

Specification Value
Memory type LPDDR3-1600 left arrow LPDDR3-1600
Max. Memory 4 GB left arrow
Memory channels 2 (Dual Channel) left arrow 2
ECC No left arrow No

Thermal Management

Let's find out what TDP value would be better for Intel Atom Z3530 or HiSilicon Kirin 928? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.

Specification Value
Tjunction max. 90 \xc2\xb0C left arrow --

Technical details

Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for Intel Atom Z3530 and HiSilicon Kirin 928 CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.

Specification Value
Technology 22 nm left arrow 28 nm
Socket FC-MB5T1064 left arrow N/A
L2-Cache 2.00 MB left arrow --
Architecture Moorefield left arrow Cortex-A15 / Cortex-A7
Virtualization Intel VT-x left arrow None
Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow ARMv7-A32 (32 bit)
ISA extensions MMX, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, left arrow
Release date Q2/2014 left arrow Q3/2014

Benchmarks

Real tests Intel Atom Z3530 vs HiSilicon Kirin 928

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

This test serves for determining the performance of integrated graphics in Intel and AMD processors.

Latest comparisons