Русский 
Deutsch 
Português 
Italiano 
Français 
日本語 
Español 
Polski 
简体中文 
한국어 
Differences
Top features of HiSilicon Kirin 928
Top features of Intel Atom Z3580
-
Higher clock speed2.33 GHz
1.30 GHz
Around 44% better clock speed
Specifications
Complete list of technical specificationsCPU generation and family
Let's find out which one of HiSilicon Kirin 928 and Intel Atom Z3580 is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Name |
HiSilicon Kirin 928
Intel Atom Z3580
|
| Segment |
Mobile
Mobile
|
| Family |
HiSilicon Kirin
Intel Atom
|
| Generation |
2
5
|
| CPU group |
HiSilicon Kirin 920
Intel Atom Z3500
|
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
In this block we are going to compare HiSilicon Kirin 928 vs Intel Atom Z3580 by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Frequency |
1.30 GHz
2.33 GHz
|
| Overclocking |
No
No
|
| Core architecture |
hybrid (big.LITTLE)
normal
|
Internal Graphics
Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in HiSilicon Kirin 928 and Intel Atom Z3580 along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| GPU name |
ARM Mali-T628 MP4
PowerVR G6430
|
| GPU frequency |
0.60 GHz
0.46 GHz
|
| GPU (Turbo) |
0.60 GHz
0.53 GHz
|
| Execution units |
4
16
|
| Shader |
64
128
|
| Max. displays |
1
2
|
| Generation |
Midgard 2
|
| Technology |
32nm
28 nm
|
| Release date |
Q4/2012
Q3/2013
|
Hardware codec support
Let's compare the support of video codecs between HiSilicon Kirin 928 and Intel Atom Z3580. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| h265 / HEVC (8 bit) |
No
No
|
| h265 / HEVC (10 bit) |
No
No
|
| h264 |
Decode / Encode
No
|
| VP9 |
No
No
|
| VP8 |
Decode / Encode
No
|
| AV1 |
No
No
|
| AVC |
No
No
|
| VC-1 |
No
No
|
| JPEG |
No
No
|
Memory & PCIe
To choose the best model between HiSilicon Kirin 928 and Intel Atom Z3580 you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Memory type |
LPDDR3-1600
LPDDR3-1600
|
| Max. Memory |
4 GB
|
| ECC |
No
No
|
| Memory channels |
2
2 (Dual Channel)
|
Thermal Management
Let's find out what TDP value would be better for HiSilicon Kirin 928 or Intel Atom Z3580? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Tjunction max. |
--
90 \xc2\xb0C
|
Technical details
Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for HiSilicon Kirin 928 and Intel Atom Z3580 CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Instruction set (ISA) |
ARMv7-A32 (32 bit)
x86-64 (64 bit)
|
| Virtualization |
None
Intel VT-x
|
| ISA extensions |
MMX, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2,
|
| L2-Cache |
--
2.00 MB
|
| Architecture |
Cortex-A15 / Cortex-A7
Moorefield
|
| Technology |
28 nm
22 nm
|
| Socket |
N/A
FC-MB5T1064
|
| Release date |
Q3/2014
Q2/2014
|
