AMD Phenom II X4 965
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
Select graphics card
Select graphics card

Comparing AMD Phenom II X4 965 vs AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G

Comparison of video cards AMD Phenom II X4 965 vs AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G in benchmarks and specifications.

Differences

AMD Phenom II X4 965

Top features of AMD Phenom II X4 965

Report a bug
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G

Top features of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G

Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    3.60 GHz left arrow 3.40 GHz
    Around 6% better clock speed
  • Performance per watt
    65 W left arrow 140 W
    About 0.46 times less performance per watt

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications

CPU generation and family

Let's find out which one of AMD Phenom II X4 965 and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.

Specification Value
Name AMD Phenom II X4 965 left arrow AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
Segment Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
Family AMD Phenom II left arrow AMD Ryzen
Generation 4 left arrow 1
CPU group AMD Phenom II - 800/900 left arrow AMD Ryzen 2000G

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In this block we are going to compare AMD Phenom II X4 965 vs AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.

Specification Value
Frequency 3.40 GHz left arrow 3.60 GHz
CPU Cores 4 left arrow 4
Turbo (1 Core) No turbo left arrow 3.90 GHz
CPU Threads 4 left arrow 8
Turbo (4 Cores) No turbo left arrow 3.70 GHz
Hyperthreading No left arrow Yes
Overclocking Yes left arrow Yes
Core architecture normal left arrow normal

Internal Graphics

Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in AMD Phenom II X4 965 and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.

Specification Value
GPU name no iGPU left arrow AMD Radeon Vega 11 Graphics
GPU frequency left arrow 1.25 GHz
GPU (Turbo) No turbo left arrow No turbo
Execution units left arrow 11
Shader left arrow 704
Max. GPU Memory -- left arrow 2 GB
Max. displays left arrow 3
Generation left arrow 8
DirectX Version left arrow 12
Technology left arrow 14 nm
Release date left arrow Q1/2018

Hardware codec support

Let's compare the support of video codecs between AMD Phenom II X4 965 and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.

Specification Value
h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No left arrow Decode / Encode
h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No left arrow Decode / Encode
h264 No left arrow Decode / Encode
VP9 No left arrow Decode / Encode
VP8 No left arrow Decode / Encode
AV1 No left arrow No
AVC No left arrow Decode / Encode
VC-1 No left arrow Decode
JPEG No left arrow Decode / Encode

Memory & PCIe

To choose the best model between AMD Phenom II X4 965 and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.

Specification Value
Memory type DDR2-1066 left arrow DDR4-2933
Max. Memory left arrow 64 GB
ECC No left arrow Yes
Memory channels 2 left arrow 2
PCIe version left arrow 3.0
PCIe lanes left arrow 12

Encryption

AES-NI encryption support for CPUs AMD Phenom II X4 965 and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G.

Specification Value
AES-NI No left arrow Yes

Thermal Management

Let's find out what TDP value would be better for AMD Phenom II X4 965 or AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.

Specification Value
TDP (PL1) 140 W left arrow 65 W
TDP down -- left arrow 46 W
Tjunction max. -- left arrow 95 °C

Technical details

Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for AMD Phenom II X4 965 and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.

Specification Value
Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
Virtualization AMD-V left arrow AMD-V, SVM
ISA extensions SSE3, SSE4a left arrow SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
L3-Cache 6.00 MB left arrow 4.00 MB
Architecture Deneb (K10) left arrow Raven Ridge (Zen)
Technology 45 nm left arrow 14 nm
Socket AM3 left arrow AM4
Release date Q3/2009 left arrow Q1/2018

Devices using this processor

List of devices based on AMD Phenom II X4 965 and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G.

Specification Value
Used in Unknown left arrow Unknown

Benchmarks

Real tests AMD Phenom II X4 965 vs AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is based on Cinema 4 Suite.

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

It is the new version of the benchmark which is developed on the basis of Cinebench R15 (both versions are operated on the basis of Cinema 4 - the most popular 3D modeling software).

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

The latter is used for creation of 3D models and forms.

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 can be used for multi-core processor performance benchmark testing.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 benchmark is the newest software suit.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 software suite shows benchmark testing results of the memory performance and speed of the multi-core processor.

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

It tests entire and overall performance of the central processing unit (mathematical calculations, compression and decompression speed, 2D&3D graphic tests).

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3 is the benchmark for Intel and AMD 64-bit processors.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3 benchmark supports AMD and Intel multi-core processors.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

This synthetic test will help you determine the real computing power of a single core in the central processing unit.

Latest comparisons