Samsung Exynos 7270
MediaTek MT6750N
Select graphics card
Select graphics card

Comparing MediaTek MT6750N vs Samsung Exynos 7270

Comparison of video cards MediaTek MT6750N vs Samsung Exynos 7270 in benchmarks and specifications.

Differences

Samsung Exynos 7270

Top features of Samsung Exynos 7270

Report a bug
MediaTek MT6750N

Top features of MediaTek MT6750N

Report a bug

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications

CPU generation and family

Let's find out which one of Samsung Exynos 7270 and MediaTek MT6750N is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.

Specification Value
Name Samsung Exynos 7270 left arrow MediaTek MT6750N
Family Samsung Exynos left arrow Mediatek MT-Serie
CPU group Samsung Exynos 7570/7870/7880 left arrow MediaTek MT67xx
Segment Mobile left arrow Mobile
Generation 1 left arrow 1

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In this block we are going to compare Samsung Exynos 7270 vs MediaTek MT6750N by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.

Specification Value
CPU Cores / Threads 2 / 2 left arrow 8 / 8
Core architecture normal left arrow hybrid (big.LITTLE)
Hyperthreading / SMT No left arrow No
Overclocking No left arrow No

Internal Graphics

Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in Samsung Exynos 7270 and MediaTek MT6750N along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.

Specification Value
GPU name ARM Mali-T720 MP1 left arrow ARM Mali-T860 MP2
GPU frequency 0.60 GHz left arrow 0.52 GHz
GPU (Turbo) 0.60 GHz left arrow 0.52 GHz
Execution units 1 left arrow 2
Shader 16 left arrow 32
Max. displays 2 left arrow 2
Generation Midgard 3 left arrow Midgard 4
Direct X 11 left arrow 11
Technology 28nm left arrow 28nm
Release date Q4/2013 left arrow Q4/2015

Hardware codec support

Let's compare the support of video codecs between Samsung Exynos 7270 and MediaTek MT6750N. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.

Specification Value
h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No left arrow Decode / Encode
h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No left arrow Decode
h264 Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
VP8 Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
VP9 No left arrow No
AV1 No left arrow No
AVC No left arrow No
VC-1 No left arrow No
JPEG No left arrow Decode / Encode

Memory & PCIe

To choose the best model between Samsung Exynos 7270 and MediaTek MT6750N you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.

Specification Value
Memory type LPDDR3-667 left arrow LPDDR3-667
Max. Memory left arrow 4 GB
Memory channels 0 left arrow 1 (Single Channel)
ECC No left arrow No
AES-NI No left arrow No

Thermal Management

Let's find out what TDP value would be better for Samsung Exynos 7270 or MediaTek MT6750N? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.

Specification Value

Technical details

Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for Samsung Exynos 7270 and MediaTek MT6750N CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.

Specification Value
Technology 14 nm left arrow 28 nm
Chip design left arrow Chiplet
Socket N/A left arrow N/A
Architecture Cortex-A53 left arrow Cortex-A53
Operating systems Android left arrow Android
Virtualization None left arrow None
Instruction set (ISA) ARMv8-A64 (64 bit) left arrow ARMv8-A64 (64 bit)
Release date Q3/2016 left arrow Q1/2018

Benchmarks

Real tests Samsung Exynos 7270 vs MediaTek MT6750N

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

This test serves for determining the performance of integrated graphics in Intel and AMD processors.

Latest comparisons