MediaTek MT8389
MediaTek MT8389T
Select graphics card
Select graphics card

Comparing MediaTek MT8389 vs MediaTek MT8389T

Comparison of video cards MediaTek MT8389 vs MediaTek MT8389T in benchmarks and specifications.

Differences

MediaTek MT8389

Top features of MediaTek MT8389

Report a bug
MediaTek MT8389T

Top features of MediaTek MT8389T

Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    1.50 GHz left arrow 1.20 GHz
    Around 20% better clock speed

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications

CPU generation and family

Let's find out which one of MediaTek MT8389 and MediaTek MT8389T is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.

Specification Value
Name MediaTek MT8389 left arrow MediaTek MT8389T
Family Mediatek MT-Serie left arrow Mediatek MT-Serie
CPU group MediaTek MT83xx A7 left arrow MediaTek MT83xx A7
Segment Mobile left arrow Mobile
Generation 1 left arrow 1

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In this block we are going to compare MediaTek MT8389 vs MediaTek MT8389T by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.

Specification Value
CPU Cores / Threads 4 / 4 left arrow 4 / 4
Core architecture normal left arrow normal
Cores 4x Cortex-A7 left arrow 4x Cortex-A7
Hyperthreading / SMT No left arrow No
Overclocking No left arrow No
Frequency 1.20 GHz left arrow 1.50 GHz
Turbo Frequency (4 Cores) 1.20 GHz left arrow 1.50 GHz

Internal Graphics

Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in MediaTek MT8389 and MediaTek MT8389T along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.

Specification Value
GPU name PowerVR SGX544 left arrow PowerVR SGX544
GPU frequency 0.29 GHz left arrow 0.36 GHz
GPU (Turbo) 0.29 GHz left arrow 0.36 GHz
Execution units 2 left arrow 2
Shader 4 left arrow 4
Max. displays 1 left arrow 1
Direct X 10.1 left arrow 10.1
Technology 45nm left arrow 45nm
Release date Q1/2010 left arrow Q1/2010

Hardware codec support

Let's compare the support of video codecs between MediaTek MT8389 and MediaTek MT8389T. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.

Specification Value
h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No left arrow No
h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No left arrow No
h264 Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
VP8 Decode left arrow Decode
VP9 No left arrow No
AV1 No left arrow No
AVC No left arrow No
VC-1 No left arrow No
JPEG No left arrow No

Memory & PCIe

To choose the best model between MediaTek MT8389 and MediaTek MT8389T you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.

Specification Value
Memory type LPDDR2 left arrow LPDDR2
ECC No left arrow No
AES-NI No left arrow No

Thermal Management

Let's find out what TDP value would be better for MediaTek MT8389 or MediaTek MT8389T? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.

Specification Value

Technical details

Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for MediaTek MT8389 and MediaTek MT8389T CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.

Specification Value
Technology 28 nm left arrow 28 nm
Chip design Chiplet left arrow Chiplet
Socket N/A left arrow N/A
L2-Cache 1.00 MB left arrow 1.00 MB
Architecture Cortex-A7 left arrow Cortex-A7
Operating systems Android left arrow Android
Virtualization None left arrow None
Instruction set (ISA) ARMv7-A32 (32 bit) left arrow ARMv7-A32 (32 bit)
Release date Q2/2013 left arrow Q2/2013

Benchmarks

Real tests MediaTek MT8389 vs MediaTek MT8389T

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

This test serves for determining the performance of integrated graphics in Intel and AMD processors.

Latest comparisons