MediaTek MT8389
MediaTek MT6517
Select graphics card
Select graphics card

Comparing MediaTek MT6517 vs MediaTek MT8389

Comparison of video cards MediaTek MT6517 vs MediaTek MT8389 in benchmarks and specifications.

Differences

MediaTek MT8389

Top features of MediaTek MT8389

Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    1.20 GHz left arrow 1.00 GHz
    Around -20% better clock speed
MediaTek MT6517

Top features of MediaTek MT6517

Report a bug

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications

CPU generation and family

Let's find out which one of MediaTek MT8389 and MediaTek MT6517 is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.

Specification Value
Name MediaTek MT8389 left arrow MediaTek MT6517
Family Mediatek MT-Serie left arrow Mediatek MT-Serie
CPU group MediaTek MT83xx A7 left arrow MediaTek MT65xx A9
Segment Mobile left arrow Mobile
Generation 1 left arrow 1

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In this block we are going to compare MediaTek MT8389 vs MediaTek MT6517 by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.

Specification Value
CPU Cores / Threads 4 / 4 left arrow 2 / 2
Core architecture normal left arrow normal
Cores 4x Cortex-A7 left arrow 2x Cortex-A9
Hyperthreading / SMT No left arrow No
Overclocking No left arrow No
Frequency 1.20 GHz left arrow 1.00 GHz

Internal Graphics

Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in MediaTek MT8389 and MediaTek MT6517 along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.

Specification Value
GPU name PowerVR SGX544 left arrow PowerVR SGX531
GPU frequency 0.29 GHz left arrow 0.52 GHz
GPU (Turbo) 0.29 GHz left arrow 0.52 GHz
Execution units 2 left arrow 1
Shader 4 left arrow 0
Max. displays 1 left arrow 1
Direct X 10.1 left arrow 10.1
Technology 45nm left arrow 65nm
Release date Q1/2010 left arrow Q4/2006

Hardware codec support

Let's compare the support of video codecs between MediaTek MT8389 and MediaTek MT6517. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.

Specification Value
h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No left arrow No
h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No left arrow No
h264 Decode / Encode left arrow No
VP8 Decode left arrow No
VP9 No left arrow No
AV1 No left arrow No
AVC No left arrow No
VC-1 No left arrow No
JPEG No left arrow No

Memory & PCIe

To choose the best model between MediaTek MT8389 and MediaTek MT6517 you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.

Specification Value
Memory type LPDDR2 left arrow LPDDR2
ECC No left arrow No
AES-NI No left arrow No

Thermal Management

Let's find out what TDP value would be better for MediaTek MT8389 or MediaTek MT6517? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.

Specification Value

Technical details

Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for MediaTek MT8389 and MediaTek MT6517 CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.

Specification Value
Technology 28 nm left arrow 40 nm
Chip design Chiplet left arrow Chiplet
Socket N/A left arrow N/A
L2-Cache 1.00 MB left arrow --
Architecture Cortex-A7 left arrow Cortex-A9
Operating systems Android left arrow Android
Virtualization None left arrow None
Instruction set (ISA) ARMv7-A32 (32 bit) left arrow ARMv7-A32 (32 bit)
Release date Q2/2013 left arrow 2012

Benchmarks

Real tests MediaTek MT8389 vs MediaTek MT6517

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

This test serves for determining the performance of integrated graphics in Intel and AMD processors.

Latest comparisons