Русский 
Deutsch 
Português 
Italiano 
Français 
日本語 
Español 
Polski 
简体中文 
한국어 
Differences
Top features of Intel Xeon D-1749NT
-
Higher clock speed3.00 GHz
2.50 GHz
Around -20% better clock speed
Top features of AMD EPYC Embedded 3255
-
Performance per watt55 W
90 W
About 0.61 times less performance per watt
Specifications
Complete list of technical specificationsCPU generation and family
Let's find out which one of Intel Xeon D-1749NT and AMD EPYC Embedded 3255 is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Name |
Intel Xeon D-1749NT
AMD EPYC Embedded 3255
|
| Family |
Intel Xeon D
AMD EPYC
|
| CPU group |
Intel Xeon D-1700
AMD EPYC Embedded 3000
|
| Segment |
Desktop / Server
Desktop / Server
|
| Generation |
4
1
|
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
In this block we are going to compare Intel Xeon D-1749NT vs AMD EPYC Embedded 3255 by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads |
10 / 20
8 / 16
|
| Core architecture |
normal
normal
|
| Cores |
10x Sunny Cove
8x
|
| Hyperthreading / SMT |
Yes
Yes
|
| Overclocking |
No
Yes
|
| Frequency |
3.00 GHz
2.50 GHz
|
| Turbo Frequency (1 Core) |
3.50 GHz
3.10 GHz
|
Internal Graphics
Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in Intel Xeon D-1749NT and AMD EPYC Embedded 3255 along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| GPU name |
no iGPU
no iGPU
|
| GPU (Turbo) |
No turbo
No turbo
|
Hardware codec support
Let's compare the support of video codecs between Intel Xeon D-1749NT and AMD EPYC Embedded 3255. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| h265 / HEVC (8 bit) |
No
No
|
| h265 / HEVC (10 bit) |
No
No
|
| h264 |
No
No
|
| VP8 |
No
No
|
| VP9 |
No
No
|
| AV1 |
No
No
|
| AVC |
No
No
|
| VC-1 |
No
No
|
| JPEG |
No
No
|
Memory & PCIe
To choose the best model between Intel Xeon D-1749NT and AMD EPYC Embedded 3255 you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Memory type |
DDR4-2666
DDR4-2666
|
| Max. Memory |
256 GB
512 GB
|
| Memory channels |
2 (Dual Channel)
2 (Dual Channel)
|
| Bandwidth |
42.7 GB/s
42.6 GB/s
|
| ECC |
Yes
Yes
|
| PCIe |
4.0 x 16
3.0 x 32
|
| AES-NI |
Yes
Yes
|
Thermal Management
Let's find out what TDP value would be better for Intel Xeon D-1749NT or AMD EPYC Embedded 3255? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| TDP (PL1) |
90 W
55 W
|
| TDP down |
--
25 W
|
| Tjunction max. |
--
105 \xc2\xb0C
|
Technical details
Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for Intel Xeon D-1749NT and AMD EPYC Embedded 3255 CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Technology |
10 nm
14 nm
|
| Chip design |
Monolithic
Chiplet
|
| Socket |
BGA 2227
SP4r2
|
| L2-Cache |
15.00 MB
4.00 MB
|
| L3-Cache |
--
16.00 MB
|
| Architecture |
Ice Lake
Snowy Owl (Zen)
|
| Operating systems |
Windows 10, Linux
Windows 10, Linux
|
| Virtualization |
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
AMD-V, SVM
|
| Instruction set (ISA) |
x86-64 (64 bit)
x86-64 (64 bit)
|
| ISA extensions |
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
|
| Release date |
Q1/2022
Q1/2018
|
| Release price |
1189 $
--
|
| Documents |
--
Technical data sheet
|
