Русский 
Deutsch 
Português 
Italiano 
Français 
日本語 
Español 
Polski 
简体中文 
한국어 
Differences
Top features of Intel Xeon D-1627
-
Higher clock speed2.90 GHz
2.00 GHz
Around -45% better clock speed
Top features of Intel Atom C3808
-
Performance per watt25 W
45 W
About 0.56 times less performance per watt
Specifications
Complete list of technical specificationsCPU generation and family
Let's find out which one of Intel Xeon D-1627 and Intel Atom C3808 is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Name |
Intel Xeon D-1627
Intel Atom C3808
|
| Family |
Intel Xeon D
Intel Atom
|
| CPU group |
Intel Xeon D-1600
Intel Atom C3000
|
| Segment |
Desktop / Server
Desktop / Server
|
| Generation |
3
2
|
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
In this block we are going to compare Intel Xeon D-1627 vs Intel Atom C3808 by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Core architecture |
normal
normal
|
| Overclocking |
No
No
|
| Frequency |
2.90 GHz
2.00 GHz
|
Internal Graphics
Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in Intel Xeon D-1627 and Intel Atom C3808 along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| GPU name |
no iGPU
no iGPU
|
| GPU (Turbo) |
No turbo
No turbo
|
Hardware codec support
Let's compare the support of video codecs between Intel Xeon D-1627 and Intel Atom C3808. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| h265 / HEVC (8 bit) |
No
No
|
| h265 / HEVC (10 bit) |
No
No
|
| h264 |
No
No
|
| VP8 |
No
No
|
| VP9 |
No
No
|
| AV1 |
No
No
|
| AVC |
No
No
|
| VC-1 |
No
No
|
| JPEG |
No
No
|
Memory & PCIe
To choose the best model between Intel Xeon D-1627 and Intel Atom C3808 you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Memory type |
DDR4-2133
DDR4-2133
|
| Max. Memory |
128 GB
256 GB
|
| Memory channels |
2 (Dual Channel)
2
|
| ECC |
Yes
Yes
|
Thermal Management
Let's find out what TDP value would be better for Intel Xeon D-1627 or Intel Atom C3808? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| TDP (PL1) |
45 W
25 W
|
| Tjunction max. |
--
100 °C
|
Technical details
Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for Intel Xeon D-1627 and Intel Atom C3808 CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Technology |
14 nm
14 nm
|
| Socket |
BGA 1667
BGA 1310
|
| L2-Cache |
6.00 MB
12.00 MB
|
| Architecture |
Hewitt Lake
Denverton
|
| Virtualization |
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
|
| Instruction set (ISA) |
x86-64 (64 bit)
x86-64 (64 bit)
|
| ISA extensions |
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2
SSE4.1, SSE4.2
|
| Release date |
Q2/2019
Q3/2017
|
