Intel Core2 Duo T6570
Intel Celeron J1900
Select graphics card
Select graphics card

Comparing Intel Core2 Duo T6570 vs Intel Celeron J1900

Comparison of video cards Intel Core2 Duo T6570 vs Intel Celeron J1900 in benchmarks and specifications.

Differences

Intel Core2 Duo T6570

Top features of Intel Core2 Duo T6570

Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    2.10 GHz left arrow 2.00 GHz
    Around -5% better clock speed
Intel Celeron J1900

Top features of Intel Celeron J1900

Report a bug
  • Performance per watt
    10 W left arrow 35 W
    About 0.29 times less performance per watt

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications

CPU generation and family

Let's find out which one of Intel Core2 Duo T6570 and Intel Celeron J1900 is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.

Specification Value
Name Intel Core2 Duo T6570 left arrow Intel Celeron J1900
Family AMD A left arrow Intel Celeron
CPU group Intel Core 2 Duo T6000 left arrow Intel Celeron J1000/N2000
Segment Mobile left arrow Mobile
Generation 2 left arrow 6

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In this block we are going to compare Intel Core2 Duo T6570 vs Intel Celeron J1900 by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.

Specification Value
Core architecture normal left arrow normal
Overclocking No left arrow No
Frequency 2.10 GHz left arrow 2.00 GHz

Internal Graphics

Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in Intel Core2 Duo T6570 and Intel Celeron J1900 along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.

Specification Value
GPU name no iGPU left arrow Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)
GPU frequency left arrow 0.69 GHz
GPU (Turbo) No turbo left arrow 0.85 GHz
Execution units left arrow 4
Shader left arrow 32
Max. GPU Memory -- left arrow 8 GB
Max. displays left arrow 2
Generation left arrow 7
Technology left arrow 22 nm
Release date left arrow Q3/2013

Hardware codec support

Let's compare the support of video codecs between Intel Core2 Duo T6570 and Intel Celeron J1900. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.

Specification Value
h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No left arrow No
h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No left arrow No
h264 No left arrow Decode / Encode
VP8 No left arrow No
VP9 No left arrow No
AV1 No left arrow No
AVC No left arrow Decode / Encode
VC-1 No left arrow Decode
JPEG No left arrow Decode

Memory & PCIe

To choose the best model between Intel Core2 Duo T6570 and Intel Celeron J1900 you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.

Specification Value
Max. Memory left arrow 8 GB
Memory channels 0 left arrow 2
ECC No left arrow No

Thermal Management

Let's find out what TDP value would be better for Intel Core2 Duo T6570 or Intel Celeron J1900? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.

Specification Value
TDP (PL1) 35 W left arrow 10 W
Tjunction max. 100 \xc2\xb0C left arrow --

Technical details

Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for Intel Core2 Duo T6570 and Intel Celeron J1900 CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.

Specification Value
Technology 45 nm left arrow 22 nm
Socket PGA 478 left arrow BGA 1170
L2-Cache 2.00 MB left arrow --
L3-Cache -- left arrow 2.00 MB
Architecture Penryn (Core) left arrow Bay Trail
Virtualization VT-x left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT
Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
ISA extensions MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3,SSSE3, SSE4.1 left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2
Release date Q2/2009 left arrow Q4/2013

Latest comparisons