Intel Celeron N3350
Intel Celeron J3355E
Select graphics card
Select graphics card

Comparing Intel Celeron N3350 vs Intel Celeron J3355E

Comparison of video cards Intel Celeron N3350 vs Intel Celeron J3355E in benchmarks and specifications.

Differences

Intel Celeron N3350

Top features of Intel Celeron N3350

Report a bug
  • Performance per watt
    6 W left arrow 10 W
    About 1.67 0.97 times less performance per watt
Intel Celeron J3355E

Top features of Intel Celeron J3355E

Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    2.00 GHz left arrow 1.10 GHz
    Around 45% better clock speed
  • Higher turbo clock speed
    2.50 GHz left arrow 2.40 GHz
    Around 4 % better overclocked clock speed

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications

CPU generation and family

Let's find out which one of Intel Celeron N3350 and Intel Celeron J3355E is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.

Specification Value
Name Intel Celeron N3350 left arrow Intel Celeron J3355E
Segment Mobile left arrow Mobile
Family Intel Celeron left arrow Intel Celeron
Generation 8 left arrow 7
CPU group Intel Celeron J3000/N3000 left arrow Intel Celeron J3000

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In this block we are going to compare Intel Celeron N3350 vs Intel Celeron J3355E by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.

Specification Value
Frequency 1.10 GHz left arrow 2.00 GHz
CPU Cores 2 left arrow 2
Turbo (1 Core) 2.40 GHz left arrow 2.50 GHz
CPU Threads 2 left arrow 2
Turbo (2 Cores) 2.40 GHz left arrow 2.50 GHz
Hyperthreading No left arrow No
Overclocking No left arrow No
Core architecture normal left arrow normal

Internal Graphics

Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in Intel Celeron N3350 and Intel Celeron J3355E along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.

Specification Value
GPU name Intel HD Graphics 500 left arrow Intel HD Graphics 500
GPU frequency 0.20 GHz left arrow 0.25 GHz
GPU (Turbo) 0.65 GHz left arrow 0.70 GHz
Execution units 12 left arrow 12
Shader 96 left arrow 96
Max. GPU Memory 8 GB left arrow 8 GB
Max. displays 3 left arrow 3
Generation 9 left arrow 9
DirectX Version 12 left arrow 12
Technology 14 nm left arrow 14 nm
Release date Q3/2016 left arrow Q3/2016

Hardware codec support

Let's compare the support of video codecs between Intel Celeron N3350 and Intel Celeron J3355E. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.

Specification Value
h265 / HEVC (8 bit) Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
h265 / HEVC (10 bit) Decode left arrow Decode
h264 Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
VP9 Decode left arrow Decode
VP8 Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
AV1 No left arrow No
AVC Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
VC-1 Decode left arrow Decode
JPEG Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode

Memory & PCIe

To choose the best model between Intel Celeron N3350 and Intel Celeron J3355E you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.

Specification Value
Memory type DDR3-1866DDR4-2400 left arrow DDR3-1866DDR4-2400
Max. Memory 8 GB left arrow
ECC No left arrow No
Memory channels 2 left arrow 2
PCIe version 2.0 left arrow 2.0
PCIe lanes 6 left arrow 6

Encryption

AES-NI encryption support for CPUs Intel Celeron N3350 and Intel Celeron J3355E.

Specification Value
AES-NI Yes left arrow Yes

Thermal Management

Let's find out what TDP value would be better for Intel Celeron N3350 or Intel Celeron J3355E? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.

Specification Value
TDP (PL1) 6 W left arrow 10 W

Technical details

Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for Intel Celeron N3350 and Intel Celeron J3355E CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.

Specification Value
Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
ISA extensions SSE4.1, SSE4.2 left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2
L3-Cache 2.00 MB left arrow 2.00 MB
Architecture Braswell left arrow Apollo Lake
Technology 14 nm left arrow 14 nm
Socket BGA 1296 left arrow BGA 1296
Release date Q3/2016 left arrow Q3/2016

Devices using this processor

List of devices based on Intel Celeron N3350 and Intel Celeron J3355E.

Specification Value
Used in Unknown left arrow Unknown

Benchmarks

Real tests Intel Celeron N3350 vs Intel Celeron J3355E

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

The latter is used for creation of 3D models and forms.

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 can be used for multi-core processor performance benchmark testing.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 benchmark is the newest software suit.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 software suite shows benchmark testing results of the memory performance and speed of the multi-core processor.

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

This test serves for determining the performance of integrated graphics in Intel and AMD processors.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3 is the benchmark for Intel and AMD 64-bit processors.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3 benchmark supports AMD and Intel multi-core processors.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

This synthetic test will help you determine the real computing power of a single core in the central processing unit.

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

It tests entire and overall performance of the central processing unit (mathematical calculations, compression and decompression speed, 2D&3D graphic tests).

Latest comparisons