Русский 
Deutsch 
Português 
Italiano 
Français 
日本語 
Español 
Polski 
简体中文 
한국어 
Differences
Top features of Intel Atom C2316
-
Performance per watt7 W
65 W
About 9.29 0.97 times less performance per watt
Top features of AMD Athlon II X2 245
-
Higher clock speed2.90 GHz
1.50 GHz
Around 48% better clock speed
Specifications
Complete list of technical specificationsCPU generation and family
Let's find out which one of Intel Atom C2316 and AMD Athlon II X2 245 is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Name |
Intel Atom C2316
AMD Athlon II X2 245
|
| Family |
Intel Atom
AMD Athlon II
|
| CPU group |
Intel Atom C2000
AMD Athlon II X2 (Propus)
|
| Segment |
Desktop / Server
Desktop / Server
|
| Generation |
3
1
|
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
In this block we are going to compare Intel Atom C2316 vs AMD Athlon II X2 245 by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads |
2 / 2
2 / 2
|
| Core architecture |
normal
normal
|
| Cores |
2x
2x
|
| Hyperthreading / SMT |
No
No
|
| Overclocking |
No
No
|
| Frequency |
1.50 GHz
2.90 GHz
|
Internal Graphics
Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in Intel Atom C2316 and AMD Athlon II X2 245 along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| GPU name |
no iGPU
no iGPU
|
| GPU (Turbo) |
No turbo
No turbo
|
Hardware codec support
Let's compare the support of video codecs between Intel Atom C2316 and AMD Athlon II X2 245. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| h265 / HEVC (8 bit) |
No
No
|
| h265 / HEVC (10 bit) |
No
No
|
| h264 |
No
No
|
| VP8 |
No
No
|
| VP9 |
No
No
|
| AV1 |
No
No
|
| AVC |
No
No
|
| VC-1 |
No
No
|
| JPEG |
No
No
|
Memory & PCIe
To choose the best model between Intel Atom C2316 and AMD Athlon II X2 245 you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Memory type |
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1333
|
| Max. Memory |
16 GB
16 GB
|
| Memory channels |
1 (Single Channel)
2 (Dual Channel)
|
| ECC |
Yes
No
|
| PCIe |
2.0 x 8
2.0
|
| AES-NI |
Yes
No
|
Thermal Management
Let's find out what TDP value would be better for Intel Atom C2316 or AMD Athlon II X2 245? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| TDP (PL1) |
7 W
65 W
|
| Tjunction max. |
100 \xc2\xb0C
--
|
Technical details
Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for Intel Atom C2316 and AMD Athlon II X2 245 CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Technology |
22 nm
45 nm
|
| Chip design |
Monolithic
|
| Socket |
BGA 1283
AM3
|
| L2-Cache |
--
2.00 MB
|
| L3-Cache |
1.00 MB
--
|
| Architecture |
Avoton
Propus
|
| Operating systems |
Windows 10, Linux
Windows 10, Linux
|
| Virtualization |
VT-x, VT-x EPT
AMD-V
|
| Instruction set (ISA) |
x86-64 (64 bit)
x86-64 (64 bit)
|
| ISA extensions |
SSE4.1, SSE4.2
MMX, 3DNow!, SSE3, SSE4a
|
| Release date |
Q3/2017
Q3/2009
|
| Release price |
39 $
--
|
