AMD Ryzen Embedded R1600
Intel Xeon E5-2698 v4
Select graphics card
Select graphics card

Comparing AMD Ryzen Embedded R1600 vs Intel Xeon E5-2698 v4

Comparison of video cards AMD Ryzen Embedded R1600 vs Intel Xeon E5-2698 v4 in benchmarks and specifications.

Differences

AMD Ryzen Embedded R1600

Top features of AMD Ryzen Embedded R1600

Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    2.60 GHz left arrow 2.20 GHz
    Around -18% better clock speed
  • Performance per watt
    15 W left arrow 135 W
    About 9 0.97 times less performance per watt
Intel Xeon E5-2698 v4

Top features of Intel Xeon E5-2698 v4

Report a bug

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications

CPU generation and family

Let's find out which one of AMD Ryzen Embedded R1600 and Intel Xeon E5-2698 v4 is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.

Specification Value
Name AMD Ryzen Embedded R1600 left arrow Intel Xeon E5-2698 v4
Family AMD Ryzen Embedded R left arrow Intel Xeon E5
CPU group AMD Ryzen Embedded R1000 left arrow Intel Xeon E5 v4
Segment Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
Generation 1 left arrow 6
Predecessor -- left arrow Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In this block we are going to compare AMD Ryzen Embedded R1600 vs Intel Xeon E5-2698 v4 by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.

Specification Value
Core architecture normal left arrow normal
Overclocking No left arrow No
Frequency 2.60 GHz left arrow 2.20 GHz

Internal Graphics

Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in AMD Ryzen Embedded R1600 and Intel Xeon E5-2698 v4 along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.

Specification Value
GPU name no iGPU left arrow no iGPU
GPU (Turbo) No turbo left arrow No turbo

Hardware codec support

Let's compare the support of video codecs between AMD Ryzen Embedded R1600 and Intel Xeon E5-2698 v4. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.

Specification Value
h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No left arrow No
h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No left arrow No
h264 No left arrow No
VP8 No left arrow No
VP9 No left arrow No
AV1 No left arrow No
AVC No left arrow No
VC-1 No left arrow No
JPEG No left arrow No

Memory & PCIe

To choose the best model between AMD Ryzen Embedded R1600 and Intel Xeon E5-2698 v4 you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.

Specification Value
Memory type DDR4-2400 left arrow DDR4-2400
Max. Memory 32 GB left arrow
Memory channels 2 (Dual Channel) left arrow 4
ECC Yes left arrow Yes

Thermal Management

Let's find out what TDP value would be better for AMD Ryzen Embedded R1600 or Intel Xeon E5-2698 v4? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.

Specification Value
TDP (PL1) 15 W left arrow 135 W
TDP up 25 W left arrow --
TDP down 12 W left arrow --
Tjunction max. 105 \xc2\xb0C left arrow --

Technical details

Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for AMD Ryzen Embedded R1600 and Intel Xeon E5-2698 v4 CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.

Specification Value
Technology 14 nm left arrow 14 nm
Socket FP5 left arrow LGA 2011-3
L2-Cache 1.00 MB left arrow --
L3-Cache 4.00 MB left arrow 50.00 MB
Architecture Banded Kestrel (Zen) left arrow Broadwell E
Virtualization AMD-V, SVM left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
ISA extensions SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2
Release date Q2/2019 left arrow Q1/2016

Latest comparisons