Русский 
Deutsch 
Português 
Italiano 
Français 
日本語 
Español 
Polski 
简体中文 
한국어 
Differences
Top features of AMD RX-216TD
Top features of AMD GX-217GI
-
Higher clock speed1.70 GHz
1.60 GHz
Around 6% better clock speed -
Performance per watt12 W
15 W
About 0.8 times less performance per watt
Specifications
Complete list of technical specificationsCPU generation and family
Let's find out which one of AMD RX-216TD and AMD GX-217GI is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Name |
AMD RX-216TD
AMD GX-217GI
|
| Family |
AMD R
AMD G
|
| CPU group |
AMD RX 1st Gen.
AMD GX 3rd Gen.
|
| Segment |
Mobile
Mobile
|
| Generation |
1
3
|
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
In this block we are going to compare AMD RX-216TD vs AMD GX-217GI by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads |
2 / 2
2 / 2
|
| Core architecture |
normal
normal
|
| Cores |
2x
2x
|
| Hyperthreading / SMT |
No
No
|
| Overclocking |
No
No
|
| Frequency |
1.60 GHz
1.70 GHz
|
| Turbo Frequency (1 Core) |
3.00 GHz
2.00 GHz
|
Internal Graphics
Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in AMD RX-216TD and AMD GX-217GI along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| GPU name |
no iGPU
AMD Radeon R6E
|
| GPU frequency |
0.76 GHz
|
| GPU (Turbo) |
No turbo
No turbo
|
| Execution units |
4
|
| Shader |
256
|
| Max. displays |
2
|
| Direct X |
--
0
|
| Release date |
2015
|
Hardware codec support
Let's compare the support of video codecs between AMD RX-216TD and AMD GX-217GI. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| h265 / HEVC (8 bit) |
No
No
|
| h265 / HEVC (10 bit) |
No
No
|
| h264 |
No
No
|
| VP8 |
No
No
|
| VP9 |
No
No
|
| AV1 |
No
No
|
| AVC |
No
No
|
| VC-1 |
No
No
|
| JPEG |
No
No
|
Memory & PCIe
To choose the best model between AMD RX-216TD and AMD GX-217GI you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Memory type |
DDR3-1600, DDR4-1600
DDR3-1600, DDR4-1600
|
| Memory channels |
2 (Dual Channel)
2 (Dual Channel)
|
| ECC |
Yes
No
|
| PCIe |
3 x 12
3 x 8
|
| AES-NI |
Yes
Yes
|
Thermal Management
Let's find out what TDP value would be better for AMD RX-216TD or AMD GX-217GI? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| TDP (PL1) |
15 W
12 W
|
| TDP up |
--
15 W
|
| TDP down |
12 W
--
|
| Tjunction max. |
90 \xc2\xb0C
--
|
Technical details
Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for AMD RX-216TD and AMD GX-217GI CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Technology |
28 nm
28 nm
|
| Socket |
FP4
FP4
|
| L2-Cache |
1.00 MB
1.00 MB
|
| Architecture |
Merlin Falcon (Excavator)
Prairie Falcon Excavator+
|
| Virtualization |
AMD-V, AMD-Vt
None
|
| Instruction set (ISA) |
x86-64 (64 bit)
x86-64 (64 bit)
|
| ISA extensions |
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4
|
| Release date |
Q4/2015
Q2/2016
|
| Part Number |
RE216GAAY23KA
GE217GAAY23KA
|
