AMD GX-210JA VS Intel Celeron N2810

Comparing AMD GX-210JA vs Intel Celeron N2810

Comparison of video cards AMD GX-210JA vs Intel Celeron N2810 in benchmarks and specifications.

Differences Specifications Benchmarks

Differences

Top features of AMD GX-210JA

Report a bug

Performance per watt

6 W 7.5 W

About 1.25 0.97 times less performance per watt

Top features of Intel Celeron N2810

Report a bug

Higher clock speed

2.00 GHz 1.00 GHz

Around 50% better clock speed

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications

AMD GX-210JA Intel Celeron N2810

CPU generation and family

Let's find out which one of AMD GX-210JA and Intel Celeron N2810 is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.

Specification	Value
Name	AMD GX-210JA Intel Celeron N2810
Family	AMD G Intel Celeron
CPU group	AMD GX 1st Gen. Intel Celeron J1000/N2000
Segment	Mobile Mobile
Generation	1 6

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In this block we are going to compare AMD GX-210JA vs Intel Celeron N2810 by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.

Specification	Value
Core architecture	normal normal
Overclocking	Yes No
Frequency	1.00 GHz 2.00 GHz

Internal Graphics

Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in AMD GX-210JA and Intel Celeron N2810 along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.

Specification	Value
GPU name	AMD Radeon HD 8180 Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)
GPU frequency	0.23 GHz 0.31 GHz
GPU (Turbo)	No turbo 0.76 GHz
Execution units	2 4
Shader	128 32
Max. GPU Memory	2 GB 8 GB
Max. displays	2 2
Generation	5 7
Technology	28 nm 22 nm
Release date	Q2/2013 Q3/2013

Hardware codec support

Let's compare the support of video codecs between AMD GX-210JA and Intel Celeron N2810. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.

Specification	Value
h265 / HEVC (8 bit)	No No
h265 / HEVC (10 bit)	No No
h264	Decode Decode / Encode
VP8	No No
VP9	No No
AV1	No No
AVC	Decode Decode / Encode
VC-1	Decode Decode
JPEG	Decode / Encode Decode

Memory & PCIe

To choose the best model between AMD GX-210JA and Intel Celeron N2810 you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.

Specification	Value
Memory type	DDR3L-1066 SO-DIMM DDR3L-1066 SO-DIMM
Memory channels	2 (Dual Channel) 2
ECC	No No

Thermal Management

Let's find out what TDP value would be better for AMD GX-210JA or Intel Celeron N2810? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.

Specification	Value
TDP (PL1)	6 W 7.5 W

Technical details

Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for AMD GX-210JA and Intel Celeron N2810 CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.

Specification	Value
Technology	28 nm 22 nm
Socket	FT3 BGA 1170
L2-Cache	1.00 MB --
L3-Cache	-- 1.00 MB
Architecture	Temash (Jaguar) Bay Trail
Virtualization	AMD-V VT-x, VT-x EPT
Instruction set (ISA)	x86-64 (64 bit) x86-64 (64 bit)
ISA extensions	SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4 SSE4.1, SSE4.2
Release date	Q2/2013 Q4/2013