Русский 
Deutsch 
Português 
Italiano 
Français 
日本語 
Español 
Polski 
简体中文 
한국어 
Differences
Top features of AMD FX-9830P
-
Higher clock speed3.00 GHz
2.10 GHz
Around -43% better clock speed
Top features of AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
-
Performance per watt15 W
35 W
About 0.43 times less performance per watt
Specifications
Complete list of technical specificationsCPU generation and family
Let's find out which one of AMD FX-9830P and AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Name |
AMD FX-9830P
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
|
| Family |
AMD FX
AMD Ryzen
|
| CPU group |
AMD FX-9800
AMD Ryzen 3000U
|
| Segment |
Mobile
Mobile
|
| Generation |
4
2
|
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
In this block we are going to compare AMD FX-9830P vs AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Core architecture |
normal
normal
|
| Overclocking |
No
No
|
| Frequency |
3.00 GHz
2.10 GHz
|
Internal Graphics
Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in AMD FX-9830P and AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| GPU name |
AMD Radeon R7 - 512 (Bristol Ridge)
AMD Radeon Vega 6 Graphics
|
| GPU frequency |
0.90 GHz
1.10 GHz
|
| GPU (Turbo) |
No turbo
No turbo
|
| Execution units |
8
6
|
| Shader |
512
384
|
| Max. GPU Memory |
2 GB
2 GB
|
| Max. displays |
2
3
|
| Generation |
6
8
|
| Technology |
28 nm
14 nm
|
| Release date |
Q2/2016
Q1/2018
|
Hardware codec support
Let's compare the support of video codecs between AMD FX-9830P and AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| h265 / HEVC (8 bit) |
No
Decode / Encode
|
| h265 / HEVC (10 bit) |
No
Decode / Encode
|
| h264 |
Decode
Decode / Encode
|
| VP8 |
No
Decode / Encode
|
| VP9 |
No
Decode / Encode
|
| AV1 |
No
No
|
| AVC |
Decode
Decode / Encode
|
| VC-1 |
Decode
Decode
|
| JPEG |
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
|
Memory & PCIe
To choose the best model between AMD FX-9830P and AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Memory type |
DDR4-2400
DDR4-2400
|
| Max. Memory |
64 GB
|
| Memory channels |
2 (Dual Channel)
2
|
| ECC |
No
Yes
|
Thermal Management
Let's find out what TDP value would be better for AMD FX-9830P or AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| TDP (PL1) |
35 W
15 W
|
| TDP up |
45 W
35 W
|
| TDP down |
25 W
12 W
|
| Tjunction max. |
90 \xc2\xb0C
105 °C
|
Technical details
Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for AMD FX-9830P and AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Technology |
28 nm
12 nm
|
| Socket |
FP4
FP5
|
| L2-Cache |
2.00 MB
--
|
| L3-Cache |
--
4.00 MB
|
| Architecture |
Excavator (Bristol Ridge)
Picasso (Zen+)
|
| Virtualization |
AMD-V
AMD-V, SVM
|
| Instruction set (ISA) |
x86-64 (64 bit)
x86-64 (64 bit)
|
| ISA extensions |
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, FMA4
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
|
| Release date |
Q2/2016
Q1/2019
|
