Qualcomm Snapdragon 625
Samsung Exynos 7872
Select graphics card
Select graphics card

Comparing Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 vs Samsung Exynos 7872

Comparison of video cards Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 vs Samsung Exynos 7872 in benchmarks and specifications.

Differences

Qualcomm Snapdragon 625

Top features of Qualcomm Snapdragon 625

Report a bug
Samsung Exynos 7872

Top features of Samsung Exynos 7872

Report a bug

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications

CPU generation and family

Let's find out which one of Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 and Samsung Exynos 7872 is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.

Specification Value
Name Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 left arrow Samsung Exynos 7872
Segment Mobile left arrow Mobile
Family Qualcomm Snapdragon left arrow Samsung Exynos
Generation 3 left arrow 2
CPU group Qualcomm Snapdragon 625/626 left arrow Samsung Exynos 7872/7884/7885/7904

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In this block we are going to compare Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 vs Samsung Exynos 7872 by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.

Specification Value
Overclocking No left arrow No
Core architecture normal left arrow hybrid (big.LITTLE)

Internal Graphics

Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 and Samsung Exynos 7872 along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.

Specification Value
GPU name Qualcomm Adreno 506 left arrow ARM Mali-G71 MP1
GPU frequency 0.65 GHz left arrow 0.95 GHz
GPU (Turbo) 0.65 GHz left arrow 0.95 GHz
Execution units 0 left arrow 1
Shader 96 left arrow 16
Max. GPU Memory -- left arrow 2 GB
Max. displays 0 left arrow 1
Generation 5 left arrow Bifrost 1
Technology 14 nm left arrow 16 nm
Release date Q4/2015 left arrow Q2/2016

Hardware codec support

Let's compare the support of video codecs between Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 and Samsung Exynos 7872. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.

Specification Value
h265 / HEVC (8 bit) Decode left arrow Decode / Encode
h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No left arrow Decode
h264 Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
VP9 No left arrow No
VP8 No left arrow Decode / Encode
AV1 No left arrow No
AVC No left arrow Decode / Encode
VC-1 Decode left arrow No
JPEG Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode

Memory & PCIe

To choose the best model between Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 and Samsung Exynos 7872 you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.

Specification Value
Memory type LPDDR3-933 left arrow LPDDR3-933
ECC No left arrow No
Memory channels 1 left arrow 0

Thermal Management

Let's find out what TDP value would be better for Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 or Samsung Exynos 7872? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.

Specification Value

Technical details

Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 and Samsung Exynos 7872 CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.

Specification Value
Instruction set (ISA) ARMv8-A64 (64 bit) left arrow ARMv8-A64 (64 bit)
Virtualization None left arrow None
L2-Cache -- left arrow 2.00 MB
Architecture Cortex-A53 left arrow Cortex-A73 / Cortex-A53
Technology 14 nm left arrow 14 nm
Socket N/A left arrow N/A
Release date Q2/2016 left arrow Q1/2018
Part Number MSM8953 left arrow --

Benchmarks

Real tests Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 vs Samsung Exynos 7872

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

This test serves for determining the performance of integrated graphics in Intel and AMD processors.

Latest comparisons