Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
Samsung Exynos 5250
Select graphics card
Select graphics card

Comparing Samsung Exynos 5250 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435

Comparison of video cards Samsung Exynos 5250 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 in benchmarks and specifications.

Differences

Qualcomm Snapdragon 435

Top features of Qualcomm Snapdragon 435

Report a bug
Samsung Exynos 5250

Top features of Samsung Exynos 5250

Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    1.70 GHz left arrow 1.40 GHz
    Around 18% better clock speed

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications

CPU generation and family

Let's find out which one of Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 and Samsung Exynos 5250 is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.

Specification Value
Name Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 left arrow Samsung Exynos 5250
Segment Mobile left arrow Mobile
Family Qualcomm Snapdragon left arrow Samsung Exynos
Generation 3 left arrow 2
CPU group Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 left arrow Samsung Exynos 5250

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In this block we are going to compare Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 vs Samsung Exynos 5250 by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.

Specification Value
Frequency 1.40 GHz left arrow 1.70 GHz
Overclocking No left arrow No
Core architecture normal left arrow normal

Internal Graphics

Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 and Samsung Exynos 5250 along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.

Specification Value
GPU name Qualcomm Adreno 505 left arrow ARM Mali-T604 MP4
GPU frequency 0.45 GHz left arrow 0.53 GHz
GPU (Turbo) 0.45 GHz left arrow 0.53 GHz
Execution units 0 left arrow 4
Shader 48 left arrow 64
Max. displays 0 left arrow 1
Generation 5 left arrow Midgard 1
Technology 28 nm left arrow 32nm
Release date Q4/2015 left arrow Q4/2012

Hardware codec support

Let's compare the support of video codecs between Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 and Samsung Exynos 5250. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.

Specification Value
h265 / HEVC (8 bit) Decode left arrow No
h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No left arrow No
h264 Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
VP9 No left arrow No
VP8 No left arrow Decode / Encode
AV1 No left arrow No
AVC No left arrow No
VC-1 Decode left arrow No
JPEG Decode / Encode left arrow No

Memory & PCIe

To choose the best model between Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 and Samsung Exynos 5250 you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.

Specification Value
Memory type LPDDR3-800 left arrow LPDDR3-800
ECC No left arrow No
Memory channels 1 left arrow 0

Thermal Management

Let's find out what TDP value would be better for Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 or Samsung Exynos 5250? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.

Specification Value

Technical details

Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 and Samsung Exynos 5250 CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.

Specification Value
Instruction set (ISA) ARMv8-A64 (64 bit) left arrow ARMv7-A32 (32 bit)
Virtualization None left arrow None
L2-Cache -- left arrow 1.00 MB
Architecture Cortex-A53 left arrow Cortex-A15
Technology 28 nm left arrow 32 nm
Socket N/A left arrow N/A
Release date Q4/2016 left arrow Q4/2011
Part Number MSM8940 left arrow --

Benchmarks

Real tests Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 vs Samsung Exynos 5250

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

This test serves for determining the performance of integrated graphics in Intel and AMD processors.

Latest comparisons