MediaTek MT6752M
Samsung Exynos 5260
Select graphics card
Select graphics card

Comparing Samsung Exynos 5260 vs MediaTek MT6752M

Comparison of video cards Samsung Exynos 5260 vs MediaTek MT6752M in benchmarks and specifications.

Differences

MediaTek MT6752M

Top features of MediaTek MT6752M

Report a bug
Samsung Exynos 5260

Top features of Samsung Exynos 5260

Report a bug

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications

CPU generation and family

Let's find out which one of MediaTek MT6752M and Samsung Exynos 5260 is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.

Specification Value
Name MediaTek MT6752M left arrow Samsung Exynos 5260
Family Mediatek MT-Serie left arrow Samsung Exynos
CPU group MediaTek MT67xx left arrow Samsung Exynos 5260/5410/5420/5422/5800
Segment Mobile left arrow Mobile
Generation 1 left arrow 3

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In this block we are going to compare MediaTek MT6752M vs Samsung Exynos 5260 by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.

Specification Value
CPU Cores / Threads 8 / 8 left arrow 6 / 6
Core architecture normal left arrow hybrid (big.LITTLE)
Hyperthreading / SMT No left arrow No
Overclocking No left arrow No

Internal Graphics

Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in MediaTek MT6752M and Samsung Exynos 5260 along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.

Specification Value
GPU name ARM Mali-T760 MP2 left arrow ARM Mali-T624 MP4
GPU frequency 0.70 GHz left arrow 0.60 GHz
GPU (Turbo) 0.70 GHz left arrow No turbo
Execution units 2 left arrow 4
Shader 32 left arrow 64
Max. displays 2 left arrow 1
Generation Midgard 3 left arrow Midgard 2
Direct X 11 left arrow 11
Technology 28nm left arrow 32nm
Release date Q4/2013 left arrow Q3/2012

Hardware codec support

Let's compare the support of video codecs between MediaTek MT6752M and Samsung Exynos 5260. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.

Specification Value
h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No left arrow No
h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No left arrow No
h264 Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
VP8 Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
VP9 No left arrow No
AV1 No left arrow No
AVC No left arrow No
VC-1 No left arrow No
JPEG No left arrow No

Memory & PCIe

To choose the best model between MediaTek MT6752M and Samsung Exynos 5260 you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.

Specification Value
Memory type LPDDR3-800 left arrow LPDDR3-800
Max. Memory 4 GB left arrow
Memory channels 1 (Single Channel) left arrow 0
ECC No left arrow No
AES-NI No left arrow No

Thermal Management

Let's find out what TDP value would be better for MediaTek MT6752M or Samsung Exynos 5260? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.

Specification Value

Technical details

Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for MediaTek MT6752M and Samsung Exynos 5260 CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.

Specification Value
Technology 28 nm left arrow 28 nm
Chip design Chiplet left arrow
Socket N/A left arrow N/A
L2-Cache -- left arrow 2.50 MB
Architecture Cortex-A53 left arrow Cortex-A15 / Cortex-A7
Operating systems Android left arrow Android
Virtualization None left arrow None
Instruction set (ISA) ARMv8-A64 (64 bit) left arrow ARMv7-A32 (32 bit)
Release date Q3/2014 left arrow Q1/2014

Benchmarks

Real tests MediaTek MT6752M vs Samsung Exynos 5260

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

This test serves for determining the performance of integrated graphics in Intel and AMD processors.

Latest comparisons