MediaTek MT6595M
HiSilicon Kirin 655
Select graphics card
Select graphics card

Comparing HiSilicon Kirin 655 vs MediaTek MT6595M

Comparison of video cards HiSilicon Kirin 655 vs MediaTek MT6595M in benchmarks and specifications.

Differences

MediaTek MT6595M

Top features of MediaTek MT6595M

Report a bug
HiSilicon Kirin 655

Top features of HiSilicon Kirin 655

Report a bug

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications

CPU generation and family

Let's find out which one of MediaTek MT6595M and HiSilicon Kirin 655 is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.

Specification Value
Name MediaTek MT6595M left arrow HiSilicon Kirin 655
Family Mediatek MT-Serie left arrow HiSilicon Kirin
CPU group MediaTek MT65xx A17/A7 left arrow HiSilicon Kirin 650
Segment Mobile left arrow Mobile
Generation 1 left arrow 4

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In this block we are going to compare MediaTek MT6595M vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.

Specification Value
Core architecture hybrid (big.LITTLE) left arrow hybrid (big.LITTLE)
Overclocking No left arrow No

Internal Graphics

Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in MediaTek MT6595M and HiSilicon Kirin 655 along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.

Specification Value
GPU name PowerVR G6200 left arrow ARM Mali-T830 MP2
GPU frequency 0.45 GHz left arrow 0.90 GHz
GPU (Turbo) 0.45 GHz left arrow 0.90 GHz
Execution units 2 left arrow 2
Shader 32 left arrow 32
Max. displays 2 left arrow 2
Generation left arrow Midgard 4
Technology 28 nm left arrow 28nm
Release date Q1/2012 left arrow Q4/2015

Hardware codec support

Let's compare the support of video codecs between MediaTek MT6595M and HiSilicon Kirin 655. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.

Specification Value
h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No left arrow Decode / Encode
h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No left arrow Decode
h264 No left arrow Decode / Encode
VP8 No left arrow Decode / Encode
VP9 No left arrow No
AV1 No left arrow No
AVC No left arrow No
VC-1 No left arrow No
JPEG No left arrow Decode / Encode

Memory & PCIe

To choose the best model between MediaTek MT6595M and HiSilicon Kirin 655 you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.

Specification Value
Memory type LPDDR3-933 left arrow LPDDR3-933
Memory channels 2 (Dual Channel) left arrow 2
ECC No left arrow No

Thermal Management

Let's find out what TDP value would be better for MediaTek MT6595M or HiSilicon Kirin 655? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.

Specification Value

Technical details

Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for MediaTek MT6595M and HiSilicon Kirin 655 CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.

Specification Value
Technology 28 nm left arrow 16 nm
Socket N/A left arrow N/A
L2-Cache 2.00 MB left arrow --
Architecture Cortex-A9 left arrow Cortex-A53 / Cortex-A53
Virtualization None left arrow None
Instruction set (ISA) ARMv7-A32 (32 bit) left arrow ARMv8-A64 (64 bit)
Release date Q1/2014 left arrow Q2/2016

Benchmarks

Real tests MediaTek MT6595M vs HiSilicon Kirin 655

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 benchmark is the newest software suit.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 software suite shows benchmark testing results of the memory performance and speed of the multi-core processor.

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

This test serves for determining the performance of integrated graphics in Intel and AMD processors.

Latest comparisons