Русский 
Deutsch 
Português 
Italiano 
Français 
日本語 
Español 
Polski 
简体中文 
한국어 
Differences
Top features of Intel Xeon W-3375
-
More number of cores38
8
2 times more threads -
Higher turbo clock speed4.00 GHz
3.20 GHz
Around 20% better overclocked clock speed
Top features of AMD Epyc 7252
-
Higher clock speed3.10 GHz
2.50 GHz
Around 19% better clock speed
-
Performance per watt120 W
270 W
About 0.44 times less performance per watt
Specifications
Complete list of technical specificationsCPU generation and family
Let's find out which one of Intel Xeon W-3375 and AMD Epyc 7252 is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Name |
Intel Xeon W-3375
AMD Epyc 7252
|
| Segment |
Desktop / Server
Desktop / Server
|
| Family |
Intel Xeon W
AMD Epyc
|
| Generation |
8
2
|
| CPU group |
Intel Xeon W-3300
AMD Epyc 7002
|
| Predecessor |
Intel Xeon W-3275
--
|
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
In this block we are going to compare Intel Xeon W-3375 vs AMD Epyc 7252 by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Frequency |
2.50 GHz
3.10 GHz
|
| CPU Cores |
38
8
|
| Turbo (1 Core) |
4.00 GHz
3.20 GHz
|
| CPU Threads |
72
16
|
| Hyperthreading |
Yes
Yes
|
| Overclocking |
No
No
|
| Core architecture |
normal
normal
|
Internal Graphics
Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in Intel Xeon W-3375 and AMD Epyc 7252 along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| GPU name |
no iGPU
no iGPU
|
| GPU (Turbo) |
No turbo
No turbo
|
Hardware codec support
Let's compare the support of video codecs between Intel Xeon W-3375 and AMD Epyc 7252. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| h265 / HEVC (8 bit) |
No
No
|
| h265 / HEVC (10 bit) |
No
No
|
| h264 |
No
No
|
| VP9 |
No
No
|
| VP8 |
No
No
|
| AV1 |
No
No
|
| AVC |
No
No
|
| VC-1 |
No
No
|
| JPEG |
No
No
|
Memory & PCIe
To choose the best model between Intel Xeon W-3375 and AMD Epyc 7252 you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Memory type |
DDR4-3200
DDR4-3200
|
| Max. Memory |
4096 GB
|
| ECC |
Yes
Yes
|
| Memory channels |
8
8
|
| PCIe version |
4.0
4.0
|
| PCIe lanes |
64
128
|
Encryption
AES-NI encryption support for CPUs Intel Xeon W-3375 and AMD Epyc 7252.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| AES-NI |
Yes
Yes
|
Thermal Management
Let's find out what TDP value would be better for Intel Xeon W-3375 or AMD Epyc 7252? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| TDP (PL1) |
270 W
120 W
|
Technical details
Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for Intel Xeon W-3375 and AMD Epyc 7252 CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Instruction set (ISA) |
x86-64 (64 bit)
x86-64 (64 bit)
|
| Virtualization |
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
AMD-V, SVM
|
| ISA extensions |
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
|
| L2-Cache |
47.50 MB
--
|
| L3-Cache |
57.00 MB
64.00 MB
|
| Architecture |
Ice Lake W
Rome (Zen 2)
|
| Technology |
10 nm
7 nm
|
| Socket |
LGA 4189
SP3
|
| Release date |
Q3/2021
Q3/2019
|
Devices using this processor
List of devices based on Intel Xeon W-3375 and AMD Epyc 7252.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Used in |
Unknown
Unknown
|
