Русский 
Deutsch 
Português 
Italiano 
Français 
日本語 
Español 
Polski 
简体中文 
한국어 
Differences
Top features of Intel Xeon W-3225
-
Higher clock speed3.70 GHz
3.00 GHz
Around -23% better clock speed -
More number of cores8
6
2 times more threads
Top features of Intel Core i5-9500F
-
Performance per watt65 W
160 W
About 0.41 times less performance per watt
Specifications
Complete list of technical specificationsCPU generation and family
Let's find out which one of Intel Xeon W-3225 and Intel Core i5-9500F is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Name |
Intel Xeon W-3225
Intel Core i5-9500F
|
| Segment |
Desktop / Server
Desktop / Server
|
| Family |
Intel Xeon W
Intel Core i5
|
| Generation |
7
9
|
| CPU group |
Intel Xeon W-2200/3200
Intel Core i 9000
|
| Predecessor |
--
Intel Core i5-8500
|
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
In this block we are going to compare Intel Xeon W-3225 vs Intel Core i5-9500F by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Frequency |
3.70 GHz
3.00 GHz
|
| CPU Cores |
8
6
|
| Turbo (1 Core) |
4.40 GHz
4.40 GHz
|
| CPU Threads |
16
6
|
| Hyperthreading |
Yes
No
|
| Overclocking |
No
No
|
| Core architecture |
normal
normal
|
Internal Graphics
Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in Intel Xeon W-3225 and Intel Core i5-9500F along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| GPU name |
no iGPU
no iGPU
|
| GPU (Turbo) |
No turbo
No turbo
|
Hardware codec support
Let's compare the support of video codecs between Intel Xeon W-3225 and Intel Core i5-9500F. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| h265 / HEVC (8 bit) |
No
No
|
| h265 / HEVC (10 bit) |
No
No
|
| h264 |
No
No
|
| VP9 |
No
No
|
| VP8 |
No
No
|
| AV1 |
No
No
|
| AVC |
No
No
|
| VC-1 |
No
No
|
| JPEG |
No
No
|
Memory & PCIe
To choose the best model between Intel Xeon W-3225 and Intel Core i5-9500F you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Memory type |
DDR4-2666
DDR4-2666
|
| Max. Memory |
1024 GB
128 GB
|
| ECC |
Yes
No
|
| Memory channels |
6
2
|
| PCIe version |
3.0
3.0
|
| PCIe lanes |
64
16
|
Encryption
AES-NI encryption support for CPUs Intel Xeon W-3225 and Intel Core i5-9500F.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| AES-NI |
Yes
Yes
|
Thermal Management
Let's find out what TDP value would be better for Intel Xeon W-3225 or Intel Core i5-9500F? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| TDP (PL1) |
160 W
65 W
|
| Tjunction max. |
--
100 °C
|
Technical details
Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for Intel Xeon W-3225 and Intel Core i5-9500F CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Instruction set (ISA) |
x86-64 (64 bit)
x86-64 (64 bit)
|
| Virtualization |
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
|
| ISA extensions |
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2
|
| L3-Cache |
16.50 MB
9.00 MB
|
| Architecture |
Cascade Lake W
Coffee Lake S Refresh
|
| Technology |
14 nm
14 nm
|
| Socket |
LGA 3647
LGA 1151-2
|
| Release date |
Q2/2019
Q2/2019
|
Devices using this processor
List of devices based on Intel Xeon W-3225 and Intel Core i5-9500F.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Used in |
Unknown
Unknown
|
