Differences

Top features of Intel Xeon W-3175X
-
More number of cores28
12
2 times more threads

Top features of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
-
Higher clock speed3.50 GHz
3.10 GHz
Around 11% better clock speed -
Higher turbo clock speed4.00 GHz
3.80 GHz
Around 5 % better overclocked clock speed -
Performance per watt180 W
255 W
About 0.71 times less performance per watt
Specifications
Complete list of technical specificationsCPU generation and family
Let's find out which one of Intel Xeon W-3175X and AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.
Specification | Value |
---|---|
Name |
Intel Xeon W-3175X
![]() |
Segment |
Desktop / Server
![]() |
Family |
Intel Xeon W
![]() |
Generation |
6
![]() |
CPU group |
Intel Xeon W-2100/3100
![]() |
Successor |
Intel Xeon W-3275
![]() |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
In this block we are going to compare Intel Xeon W-3175X vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.
Specification | Value |
---|---|
Frequency |
3.10 GHz
![]() |
CPU Cores |
28
![]() |
Turbo (1 Core) |
3.80 GHz
![]() |
CPU Threads |
56
![]() |
Hyperthreading |
Yes
![]() |
Overclocking |
Yes
![]() |
Core architecture |
normal
![]() |
Internal Graphics
Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in Intel Xeon W-3175X and AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.
Specification | Value |
---|---|
GPU name |
no iGPU
![]() |
GPU (Turbo) |
No turbo
![]() |
Hardware codec support
Let's compare the support of video codecs between Intel Xeon W-3175X and AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.
Specification | Value |
---|---|
h265 / HEVC (8 bit) |
No
![]() |
h265 / HEVC (10 bit) |
No
![]() |
h264 |
No
![]() |
VP9 |
No
![]() |
VP8 |
No
![]() |
AV1 |
No
![]() |
AVC |
No
![]() |
VC-1 |
No
![]() |
JPEG |
No
![]() |
Memory & PCIe
To choose the best model between Intel Xeon W-3175X and AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.
Specification | Value |
---|---|
Memory type |
DDR4-2666
![]() |
Max. Memory |
512 GB
![]() |
ECC |
Yes
![]() |
Memory channels |
6
![]() |
PCIe version |
3.0
![]() |
PCIe lanes |
48
![]() |
Encryption
AES-NI encryption support for CPUs Intel Xeon W-3175X and AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Specification | Value |
---|---|
AES-NI |
Yes
![]() |
Thermal Management
Let's find out what TDP value would be better for Intel Xeon W-3175X or AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.
Specification | Value |
---|---|
TDP (PL1) |
255 W
![]() |
Tjunction max. |
85 °C
![]() |
Technical details
Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for Intel Xeon W-3175X and AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.
Specification | Value |
---|---|
Instruction set (ISA) |
x86-64 (64 bit)
![]() |
Virtualization |
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
![]() |
ISA extensions |
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512
![]() |
L3-Cache |
38.50 MB
![]() |
Architecture |
Skylake W
![]() |
Technology |
14 nm
![]() |
Socket |
LGA 3647
![]() |
Release date |
Q4/2018
![]() |
Devices using this processor
List of devices based on Intel Xeon W-3175X and AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Specification | Value |
---|---|
Used in |
Unknown
![]() |