Русский 
Deutsch 
Português 
Italiano 
Français 
日本語 
Español 
Polski 
简体中文 
한국어 
Differences
Top features of Intel Xeon Silver 4215R
-
Higher clock speed3.20 GHz
2.40 GHz
Around -33% better clock speed
Top features of Intel Atom C3758R
-
Performance per watt26 W
130 W
About 0.2 times less performance per watt
Specifications
Complete list of technical specificationsCPU generation and family
Let's find out which one of Intel Xeon Silver 4215R and Intel Atom C3758R is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Name |
Intel Xeon Silver 4215R
Intel Atom C3758R
|
| Segment |
Desktop / Server
Desktop / Server
|
| Family |
Intel Xeon Silver
Intel Atom
|
| Generation |
2
2
|
| CPU group |
Intel Xeon Silver 4200
Intel Atom C3000
|
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
In this block we are going to compare Intel Xeon Silver 4215R vs Intel Atom C3758R by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Frequency |
3.20 GHz
2.40 GHz
|
| CPU Cores |
8
8
|
| Turbo (1 Core) |
4.00 GHz
No turbo
|
| CPU Threads |
16
8
|
| Turbo (8 Cores) |
3.80 GHz
No turbo
|
| Hyperthreading |
Yes
No
|
| Overclocking |
No
No
|
| Core architecture |
normal
normal
|
Internal Graphics
Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in Intel Xeon Silver 4215R and Intel Atom C3758R along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| GPU name |
no iGPU
no iGPU
|
| GPU (Turbo) |
No turbo
No turbo
|
Hardware codec support
Let's compare the support of video codecs between Intel Xeon Silver 4215R and Intel Atom C3758R. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| h265 / HEVC (8 bit) |
No
No
|
| h265 / HEVC (10 bit) |
No
No
|
| h264 |
No
No
|
| VP9 |
No
No
|
| VP8 |
No
No
|
| AV1 |
No
No
|
| AVC |
No
No
|
| VC-1 |
No
No
|
| JPEG |
No
No
|
Memory & PCIe
To choose the best model between Intel Xeon Silver 4215R and Intel Atom C3758R you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Memory type |
DDR4-2400
DDR4-2400
|
| Max. Memory |
1024 GB
256 GB
|
| ECC |
Yes
Yes
|
| Memory channels |
6
2
|
| PCIe version |
3.0
3.0
|
| PCIe lanes |
48
20
|
Encryption
AES-NI encryption support for CPUs Intel Xeon Silver 4215R and Intel Atom C3758R.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| AES-NI |
Yes
Yes
|
Thermal Management
Let's find out what TDP value would be better for Intel Xeon Silver 4215R or Intel Atom C3758R? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| TDP (PL1) |
130 W
26 W
|
| Tjunction max. |
--
100 °C
|
Technical details
Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for Intel Xeon Silver 4215R and Intel Atom C3758R CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Instruction set (ISA) |
x86-64 (64 bit)
x86-64 (64 bit)
|
| Virtualization |
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
|
| ISA extensions |
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512
SSE4.1, SSE4.2
|
| L2-Cache |
--
16.00 MB
|
| L3-Cache |
11.00 MB
--
|
| Architecture |
Cascade Lake
Denverton
|
| Technology |
14 nm
14 nm
|
| Socket |
LGA 3647
BGA 1310
|
| Release date |
Q1/2020
Q2/2020
|
Devices using this processor
List of devices based on Intel Xeon Silver 4215R and Intel Atom C3758R.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Used in |
Unknown
Unknown
|
