Intel Xeon Platinum 8170
AMD EPYC Embedded 3255
Select graphics card
Select graphics card

Comparing AMD EPYC Embedded 3255 vs Intel Xeon Platinum 8170

Comparison of video cards AMD EPYC Embedded 3255 vs Intel Xeon Platinum 8170 in benchmarks and specifications.

Differences

Intel Xeon Platinum 8170

Top features of Intel Xeon Platinum 8170

Report a bug
AMD EPYC Embedded 3255

Top features of AMD EPYC Embedded 3255

Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    2.50 GHz left arrow 2.10 GHz
    Around 16% better clock speed
  • Performance per watt
    55 W left arrow 165 W
    About 0.33 times less performance per watt

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications

CPU generation and family

Let's find out which one of Intel Xeon Platinum 8170 and AMD EPYC Embedded 3255 is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.

Specification Value
Name Intel Xeon Platinum 8170 left arrow AMD EPYC Embedded 3255
Segment Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
Family Intel Xeon Platinum left arrow AMD EPYC
Generation 1 left arrow 1
CPU group Intel Xeon Platinum 8100 left arrow AMD EPYC Embedded 3000

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In this block we are going to compare Intel Xeon Platinum 8170 vs AMD EPYC Embedded 3255 by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.

Specification Value
Frequency 2.10 GHz left arrow 2.50 GHz
Overclocking No left arrow Yes
Core architecture normal left arrow normal

Internal Graphics

Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in Intel Xeon Platinum 8170 and AMD EPYC Embedded 3255 along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.

Specification Value
GPU name no iGPU left arrow no iGPU
GPU (Turbo) No turbo left arrow No turbo

Hardware codec support

Let's compare the support of video codecs between Intel Xeon Platinum 8170 and AMD EPYC Embedded 3255. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.

Specification Value
h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No left arrow No
h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No left arrow No
h264 No left arrow No
VP9 No left arrow No
VP8 No left arrow No
AV1 No left arrow No
AVC No left arrow No
VC-1 No left arrow No
JPEG No left arrow No

Memory & PCIe

To choose the best model between Intel Xeon Platinum 8170 and AMD EPYC Embedded 3255 you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.

Specification Value
Memory type DDR4-2666 left arrow DDR4-2666
Max. Memory left arrow 512 GB
ECC Yes left arrow Yes
Memory channels 6 left arrow 2 (Dual Channel)

Thermal Management

Let's find out what TDP value would be better for Intel Xeon Platinum 8170 or AMD EPYC Embedded 3255? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.

Specification Value
TDP (PL1) 165 W left arrow 55 W
TDP down -- left arrow 25 W
Tjunction max. -- left arrow 105 \xc2\xb0C

Technical details

Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for Intel Xeon Platinum 8170 and AMD EPYC Embedded 3255 CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.

Specification Value
Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d left arrow AMD-V, SVM
ISA extensions SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512 left arrow SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
L2-Cache -- left arrow 4.00 MB
L3-Cache 36.00 MB left arrow 16.00 MB
Architecture Skylake left arrow Snowy Owl (Zen)
Technology 14 nm left arrow 14 nm
Socket LGA 3647 left arrow SP4r2
Release date Q3/2017 left arrow Q1/2018

Latest comparisons