Русский 
Deutsch 
Português 
Italiano 
Français 
日本語 
Español 
Polski 
简体中文 
한국어 
Differences
Top features of Intel Xeon Gold 6226R
-
More number of cores16
8
2 times more threads
Top features of AMD FX-8350
-
Higher clock speed4.00 GHz
2.90 GHz
Around 28% better clock speed
-
Higher turbo clock speed4.20 GHz
3.90 GHz
Around 7 % better overclocked clock speed
-
Performance per watt125 W
150 W
About 0.83 times less performance per watt
Specifications
Complete list of technical specificationsCPU generation and family
Let's find out which one of Intel Xeon Gold 6226R and AMD FX-8350 is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Name |
Intel Xeon Gold 6226R
AMD FX-8350
|
| Segment |
Desktop / Server
Desktop / Server
|
| Family |
Intel Xeon Gold
AMD FX
|
| Generation |
2
2
|
| CPU group |
Intel Xeon Gold 5200/6200
AMD FX-8000
|
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
In this block we are going to compare Intel Xeon Gold 6226R vs AMD FX-8350 by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Frequency |
2.90 GHz
4.00 GHz
|
| CPU Cores |
16
8
|
| Turbo (1 Core) |
3.90 GHz
4.20 GHz
|
| CPU Threads |
32
8
|
| Hyperthreading |
Yes
No
|
| Overclocking |
No
Yes
|
| Core architecture |
normal
normal
|
Internal Graphics
Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in Intel Xeon Gold 6226R and AMD FX-8350 along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| GPU name |
no iGPU
no iGPU
|
| GPU (Turbo) |
No turbo
No turbo
|
Hardware codec support
Let's compare the support of video codecs between Intel Xeon Gold 6226R and AMD FX-8350. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| h265 / HEVC (8 bit) |
No
No
|
| h265 / HEVC (10 bit) |
No
No
|
| h264 |
No
No
|
| VP9 |
No
No
|
| VP8 |
No
No
|
| AV1 |
No
No
|
| AVC |
No
No
|
| VC-1 |
No
No
|
| JPEG |
No
No
|
Memory & PCIe
To choose the best model between Intel Xeon Gold 6226R and AMD FX-8350 you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Max. Memory |
1024 GB
|
| ECC |
Yes
Yes
|
| Memory channels |
6
2
|
| PCIe version |
3.0
|
| PCIe lanes |
48
|
Encryption
AES-NI encryption support for CPUs Intel Xeon Gold 6226R and AMD FX-8350.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| AES-NI |
Yes
Yes
|
Thermal Management
Let's find out what TDP value would be better for Intel Xeon Gold 6226R or AMD FX-8350? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| TDP (PL1) |
150 W
125 W
|
Technical details
Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for Intel Xeon Gold 6226R and AMD FX-8350 CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Instruction set (ISA) |
x86-64 (64 bit)
x86-64 (64 bit)
|
| Virtualization |
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
AMD-V
|
| ISA extensions |
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4
|
| L3-Cache |
22.00 MB
8.00 MB
|
| Architecture |
Cascade Lake
Vishera (Bulldozer)
|
| Technology |
14 nm
32 nm
|
| Socket |
LGA 3647
AM3+
|
| Release date |
Q1/2020
Q4/2012
|
Devices using this processor
List of devices based on Intel Xeon Gold 6226R and AMD FX-8350.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Used in |
Unknown
Unknown
|
