Intel Xeon E5-2696 v2
AMD FX-8320E
Select graphics card
Select graphics card

Comparing AMD FX-8320E vs Intel Xeon E5-2696 v2

Comparison of video cards AMD FX-8320E vs Intel Xeon E5-2696 v2 in benchmarks and specifications.

Differences

Intel Xeon E5-2696 v2

Top features of Intel Xeon E5-2696 v2

Report a bug
AMD FX-8320E

Top features of AMD FX-8320E

Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    3.20 GHz left arrow 2.50 GHz
    Around 22% better clock speed
  • Performance per watt
    95 W left arrow 130 W
    About 0.73 times less performance per watt

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications

CPU generation and family

Let's find out which one of Intel Xeon E5-2696 v2 and AMD FX-8320E is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.

Specification Value
Name Intel Xeon E5-2696 v2 left arrow AMD FX-8320E
Family Intel Xeon E5 left arrow AMD FX
CPU group Intel Xeon E5 v2 left arrow AMD FX-8000
Segment Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
Generation 4 left arrow 2

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In this block we are going to compare Intel Xeon E5-2696 v2 vs AMD FX-8320E by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.

Specification Value
Core architecture normal left arrow normal
Overclocking No left arrow Yes
Frequency 2.50 GHz left arrow 3.20 GHz

Internal Graphics

Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in Intel Xeon E5-2696 v2 and AMD FX-8320E along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.

Specification Value
GPU name no iGPU left arrow no iGPU
GPU (Turbo) No turbo left arrow No turbo

Hardware codec support

Let's compare the support of video codecs between Intel Xeon E5-2696 v2 and AMD FX-8320E. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.

Specification Value
h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No left arrow No
h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No left arrow No
h264 No left arrow No
VP8 No left arrow No
VP9 No left arrow No
AV1 No left arrow No
AVC No left arrow No
VC-1 No left arrow No
JPEG No left arrow No

Memory & PCIe

To choose the best model between Intel Xeon E5-2696 v2 and AMD FX-8320E you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.

Specification Value
Memory type DDR3-1866 left arrow DDR3-1866
Max. Memory 768 GB left arrow
Memory channels 4 (Quad Channel) left arrow 2
ECC Yes left arrow Yes

Thermal Management

Let's find out what TDP value would be better for Intel Xeon E5-2696 v2 or AMD FX-8320E? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.

Specification Value
TDP (PL1) 130 W left arrow 95 W

Technical details

Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for Intel Xeon E5-2696 v2 and AMD FX-8320E CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.

Specification Value
Technology 22 nm left arrow 32 nm
Socket LGA 2011 left arrow AM3+
L2-Cache 3.00 MB left arrow --
L3-Cache 30.00 MB left arrow 8.00 MB
Architecture Ivy Bridge EP left arrow Vishera (Bulldozer)
Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d left arrow AMD-V
Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
ISA extensions SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4
Release date Q3/2013 left arrow Q3/2014

Latest comparisons