Русский 
Deutsch 
Português 
Italiano 
Français 
日本語 
Español 
Polski 
简体中文 
한국어 
Differences
Top features of Intel Xeon E-2378
-
Higher turbo clock speed4.80 GHz
3.30 GHz
Around 31% better overclocked clock speed -
Performance per watt65 W
155 W
About 2.38 0.97 times less performance per watt
Top features of AMD Epyc 7302P
-
Higher clock speed3.00 GHz
2.60 GHz
Around 13% better clock speed
-
More number of cores16
8
2 times more cores
Specifications
Complete list of technical specificationsCPU generation and family
Let's find out which one of Intel Xeon E-2378 and AMD Epyc 7302P is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Name |
Intel Xeon E-2378
AMD Epyc 7302P
|
| Segment |
Desktop / Server
Desktop / Server
|
| Family |
Intel Xeon E
AMD Epyc
|
| Generation |
9
2
|
| CPU group |
Intel Xeon E-2300
AMD Epyc 7002
|
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
In this block we are going to compare Intel Xeon E-2378 vs AMD Epyc 7302P by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Frequency |
2.60 GHz
3.00 GHz
|
| CPU Cores |
8
16
|
| Turbo (1 Core) |
4.80 GHz
3.30 GHz
|
| CPU Threads |
16
32
|
| Hyperthreading |
Yes
Yes
|
| Overclocking |
No
No
|
| Core architecture |
normal
normal
|
Internal Graphics
Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in Intel Xeon E-2378 and AMD Epyc 7302P along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| GPU name |
no iGPU
no iGPU
|
| GPU (Turbo) |
No turbo
No turbo
|
Hardware codec support
Let's compare the support of video codecs between Intel Xeon E-2378 and AMD Epyc 7302P. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| h265 / HEVC (8 bit) |
No
No
|
| h265 / HEVC (10 bit) |
No
No
|
| h264 |
No
No
|
| VP9 |
No
No
|
| VP8 |
No
No
|
| AV1 |
No
No
|
| AVC |
No
No
|
| VC-1 |
No
No
|
| JPEG |
No
No
|
Memory & PCIe
To choose the best model between Intel Xeon E-2378 and AMD Epyc 7302P you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Memory type |
DDR4-3200
DDR4-3200
|
| Max. Memory |
128 GB
|
| ECC |
No
Yes
|
| Memory channels |
2
8
|
| PCIe version |
4.0
4.0
|
| PCIe lanes |
20
128
|
Encryption
AES-NI encryption support for CPUs Intel Xeon E-2378 and AMD Epyc 7302P.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| AES-NI |
Yes
Yes
|
Thermal Management
Let's find out what TDP value would be better for Intel Xeon E-2378 or AMD Epyc 7302P? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| TDP (PL1) |
65 W
155 W
|
| Tjunction max. |
100 °C
--
|
Technical details
Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for Intel Xeon E-2378 and AMD Epyc 7302P CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Instruction set (ISA) |
x86-64 (64 bit)
x86-64 (64 bit)
|
| Virtualization |
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
AMD-V, SVM
|
| ISA extensions |
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
|
| L2-Cache |
4.00 MB
--
|
| L3-Cache |
16.00 MB
128.00 MB
|
| Architecture |
Rocket Lake S
Rome (Zen 2)
|
| Technology |
14 nm
7 nm
|
| Socket |
LGA 1200
SP3
|
| Release date |
Q3/2021
Q3/2019
|
Devices using this processor
List of devices based on Intel Xeon E-2378 and AMD Epyc 7302P.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Used in |
Unknown
Unknown
|
