Русский 
Deutsch 
Português 
Italiano 
Français 
日本語 
Español 
Polski 
简体中文 
한국어 
Differences
Top features of Intel Xeon D-1649N
-
Performance per watt45 W
51 W
About 1.13 0.97 times less performance per watt
Top features of Intel Celeron G3920
-
Higher clock speed2.90 GHz
2.30 GHz
Around 21% better clock speed
Specifications
Complete list of technical specificationsCPU generation and family
Let's find out which one of Intel Xeon D-1649N and Intel Celeron G3920 is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Name |
Intel Xeon D-1649N
Intel Celeron G3920
|
| Family |
Intel Xeon D
Intel Celeron
|
| CPU group |
Intel Xeon D-1600
Intel Celeron G3000
|
| Segment |
Desktop / Server
Desktop / Server
|
| Generation |
3
6
|
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
In this block we are going to compare Intel Xeon D-1649N vs Intel Celeron G3920 by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Core architecture |
normal
normal
|
| Overclocking |
No
No
|
| Frequency |
2.30 GHz
2.90 GHz
|
Internal Graphics
Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in Intel Xeon D-1649N and Intel Celeron G3920 along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| GPU name |
no iGPU
Intel HD Graphics 510
|
| GPU frequency |
0.35 GHz
|
| GPU (Turbo) |
No turbo
0.95 GHz
|
| Execution units |
12
|
| Shader |
96
|
| Max. GPU Memory |
--
32 GB
|
| Max. displays |
3
|
| Generation |
9
|
| Technology |
14 nm
|
| Release date |
Q1/2015
|
Hardware codec support
Let's compare the support of video codecs between Intel Xeon D-1649N and Intel Celeron G3920. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| h265 / HEVC (8 bit) |
No
Decode / Encode
|
| h265 / HEVC (10 bit) |
No
Decode
|
| h264 |
No
Decode / Encode
|
| VP8 |
No
Decode / Encode
|
| VP9 |
No
Decode
|
| AV1 |
No
No
|
| AVC |
No
Decode / Encode
|
| VC-1 |
No
Decode
|
| JPEG |
No
Decode
|
Memory & PCIe
To choose the best model between Intel Xeon D-1649N and Intel Celeron G3920 you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Memory type |
DDR4-2133
DDR4-2133
|
| Max. Memory |
128 GB
|
| Memory channels |
2 (Dual Channel)
2
|
| ECC |
Yes
Yes
|
Thermal Management
Let's find out what TDP value would be better for Intel Xeon D-1649N or Intel Celeron G3920? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| TDP (PL1) |
45 W
51 W
|
Technical details
Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for Intel Xeon D-1649N and Intel Celeron G3920 CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Technology |
14 nm
14 nm
|
| Socket |
BGA 1667
LGA 1151
|
| L2-Cache |
12.00 MB
--
|
| L3-Cache |
--
2.00 MB
|
| Architecture |
Hewitt Lake
Skylake S
|
| Virtualization |
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
|
| Instruction set (ISA) |
x86-64 (64 bit)
x86-64 (64 bit)
|
| ISA extensions |
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2
SSE4.1, SSE4.2
|
| Release date |
Q2/2019
Q1/2016
|
