Intel Core i7-6700K
AMD FX-8350
Select graphics card
Select graphics card

Comparing AMD FX-8350 vs Intel Core i7-6700K

Comparison of video cards AMD FX-8350 vs Intel Core i7-6700K in benchmarks and specifications.

Differences

Intel Core i7-6700K

Top features of Intel Core i7-6700K

Report a bug
  • Performance per watt
    91 W left arrow 125 W
    About 1.37 0.97 times less performance per watt
AMD FX-8350

Top features of AMD FX-8350

Report a bug
  • More number of cores
    8 left arrow 4
    2 times more cores

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications

CPU generation and family

Let's find out which one of Intel Core i7-6700K and AMD FX-8350 is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.

Specification Value
Name Intel Core i7-6700K left arrow AMD FX-8350
Segment Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
Family Intel Core i7 left arrow AMD FX
Generation 6 left arrow 2
CPU group Intel Core i 6000 left arrow AMD FX-8000
Successor Intel Core i7-7700K left arrow --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In this block we are going to compare Intel Core i7-6700K vs AMD FX-8350 by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.

Specification Value
Frequency 4.00 GHz left arrow 4.00 GHz
CPU Cores 4 left arrow 8
Turbo (1 Core) 4.20 GHz left arrow 4.20 GHz
CPU Threads 8 left arrow 8
Hyperthreading Yes left arrow No
Overclocking Yes left arrow Yes
Core architecture normal left arrow normal

Internal Graphics

Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in Intel Core i7-6700K and AMD FX-8350 along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.

Specification Value
GPU name Intel HD Graphics 530 left arrow no iGPU
GPU frequency 0.35 GHz left arrow
GPU (Turbo) 1.15 GHz left arrow No turbo
Execution units 24 left arrow
Shader 192 left arrow
Max. GPU Memory 64 GB left arrow --
Max. displays 3 left arrow
Generation 9 left arrow
DirectX Version 12 left arrow
Technology 14 nm left arrow
Release date Q3/2015 left arrow

Hardware codec support

Let's compare the support of video codecs between Intel Core i7-6700K and AMD FX-8350. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.

Specification Value
h265 / HEVC (8 bit) Decode / Encode left arrow No
h265 / HEVC (10 bit) Decode left arrow No
h264 Decode / Encode left arrow No
VP9 Decode left arrow No
VP8 Decode / Encode left arrow No
AV1 No left arrow No
AVC Decode / Encode left arrow No
VC-1 Decode left arrow No
JPEG Decode / Encode left arrow No

Memory & PCIe

To choose the best model between Intel Core i7-6700K and AMD FX-8350 you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.

Specification Value
Max. Memory 64 GB left arrow
ECC No left arrow Yes
Memory channels 2 left arrow 2
PCIe version 3.0 left arrow
PCIe lanes 16 left arrow

Encryption

AES-NI encryption support for CPUs Intel Core i7-6700K and AMD FX-8350.

Specification Value
AES-NI Yes left arrow Yes

Thermal Management

Let's find out what TDP value would be better for Intel Core i7-6700K or AMD FX-8350? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.

Specification Value
TDP (PL1) 91 W left arrow 125 W

Technical details

Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for Intel Core i7-6700K and AMD FX-8350 CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.

Specification Value
Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d left arrow AMD-V
ISA extensions SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4
L3-Cache 8.00 MB left arrow 8.00 MB
Architecture Skylake S left arrow Vishera (Bulldozer)
Technology 14 nm left arrow 32 nm
Socket LGA 1151 left arrow AM3+
Release date Q3/2015 left arrow Q4/2012

Devices using this processor

List of devices based on Intel Core i7-6700K and AMD FX-8350.

Specification Value
Used in Schenker XMG mit Intel Core i7-6700KMemory PC mit Intel Core i7-6700K left arrow Unknown

Benchmarks

Real tests Intel Core i7-6700K vs AMD FX-8350

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the newest instalment of the most popular CPU Rendering Benchmark Single-Core Cinebench.

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the newest instalment of the most popular CPU Rendering Benchmark Multi-Core Cinebench.

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is based on Cinema 4 Suite.

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

It is the new version of the benchmark which is developed on the basis of Cinebench R15 (both versions are operated on the basis of Cinema 4 - the most popular 3D modeling software).

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

The latter is used for creation of 3D models and forms.

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 can be used for multi-core processor performance benchmark testing.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 benchmark is the newest software suit.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 software suite shows benchmark testing results of the memory performance and speed of the multi-core processor.

Blender 2.81 (bmw27)

We use Blender benchmark to trace performance of the central processing unit.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3 is the benchmark for Intel and AMD 64-bit processors.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3 benchmark supports AMD and Intel multi-core processors.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

This synthetic test will help you determine the real computing power of a single core in the central processing unit.

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

It tests entire and overall performance of the central processing unit (mathematical calculations, compression and decompression speed, 2D&3D graphic tests).

Latest comparisons