Русский 
Deutsch 
Português 
Italiano 
Français 
日本語 
Español 
Polski 
简体中文 
한국어 
Differences
Top features of Intel Core i3-9100F
-
Higher clock speed3.60 GHz
2.80 GHz
Around -29% better clock speed
Top features of AMD Opteron X3418
-
Performance per watt15 W
65 W
About 0.23 times less performance per watt
Specifications
Complete list of technical specificationsCPU generation and family
Let's find out which one of Intel Core i3-9100F and AMD Opteron X3418 is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Name |
Intel Core i3-9100F
AMD Opteron X3418
|
| Segment |
Desktop / Server
Desktop / Server
|
| Family |
Intel Core i3
AMD Opteron
|
| Generation |
9
0
|
| CPU group |
Intel Core i 9000
AMD Opteron X3000
|
| Predecessor |
Intel Core i3-8100
--
|
| Successor |
Intel Core i3-10100F
--
|
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
In this block we are going to compare Intel Core i3-9100F vs AMD Opteron X3418 by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Frequency |
3.60 GHz
2.80 GHz
|
| Overclocking |
No
No
|
| Core architecture |
normal
normal
|
Internal Graphics
Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in Intel Core i3-9100F and AMD Opteron X3418 along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| GPU name |
no iGPU
AMD Radeon R7 - 384 (Toronto)
|
| GPU frequency |
0.80 GHz
|
| GPU (Turbo) |
No turbo
No turbo
|
| Execution units |
6
|
| Shader |
384
|
| Max. displays |
3
|
Hardware codec support
Let's compare the support of video codecs between Intel Core i3-9100F and AMD Opteron X3418. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| h265 / HEVC (8 bit) |
No
Decode
|
| h265 / HEVC (10 bit) |
No
No
|
| h264 |
No
Decode / Encode
|
| VP9 |
No
No
|
| VP8 |
No
No
|
| AV1 |
No
No
|
| AVC |
No
No
|
| VC-1 |
No
No
|
| JPEG |
No
Decode
|
Memory & PCIe
To choose the best model between Intel Core i3-9100F and AMD Opteron X3418 you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Memory type |
DDR4-2400
DDR4-2400
|
| Max. Memory |
64 GB
|
| ECC |
Yes
Yes
|
| Memory channels |
2
2 (Dual Channel)
|
Thermal Management
Let's find out what TDP value would be better for Intel Core i3-9100F or AMD Opteron X3418? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| TDP (PL1) |
65 W
15 W
|
| TDP up |
--
35 W
|
| TDP down |
--
12 W
|
| Tjunction max. |
100 °C
--
|
Technical details
Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for Intel Core i3-9100F and AMD Opteron X3418 CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Instruction set (ISA) |
x86-64 (64 bit)
x86-64 (64 bit)
|
| Virtualization |
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
AMD-V, AMD-Vt
|
| ISA extensions |
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2
|
| L2-Cache |
--
2.00 MB
|
| L3-Cache |
6.00 MB
--
|
| Architecture |
Coffee Lake S Refresh
Toronto (Excavator)
|
| Technology |
14 nm
28 nm
|
| Socket |
LGA 1151
FP4
|
| Release date |
Q2/2019
Q2/2015
|
| Part Number |
--
OX3418AAY43KA
|
