Intel Core i3-10100F
Intel Core i9-9900K
Select graphics card
Select graphics card

Comparing Intel Core i3-10100F vs Intel Core i9-9900K

Comparison of video cards Intel Core i3-10100F vs Intel Core i9-9900K in benchmarks and specifications.

Differences

Intel Core i3-10100F

Top features of Intel Core i3-10100F

Report a bug
  • Performance per watt
    65 W left arrow 95 W
    About 1.46 0.97 times less performance per watt
Intel Core i9-9900K

Top features of Intel Core i9-9900K

Report a bug
  • More number of cores
    8 left arrow 4
    2 times more cores
  • Higher turbo clock speed
    5.00 GHz left arrow 4.30 GHz
    Around 14 % better overclocked clock speed

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications

CPU generation and family

Let's find out which one of Intel Core i3-10100F and Intel Core i9-9900K is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.

Specification Value
Name Intel Core i3-10100F left arrow Intel Core i9-9900K
Segment Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
Family Intel Core i3 left arrow Intel Core i9
Generation 10 left arrow 9
CPU group Intel Core i 10000 left arrow Intel Core i 9000
Predecessor Intel Core i3-9100F left arrow --
Successor -- left arrow Intel Core i9-10900K

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In this block we are going to compare Intel Core i3-10100F vs Intel Core i9-9900K by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.

Specification Value
Frequency 3.60 GHz left arrow 3.60 GHz
CPU Cores 4 left arrow 8
Turbo (1 Core) 4.30 GHz left arrow 5.00 GHz
CPU Threads 8 left arrow 16
Hyperthreading Yes left arrow Yes
Overclocking No left arrow Yes
Core architecture normal left arrow normal

Internal Graphics

Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in Intel Core i3-10100F and Intel Core i9-9900K along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.

Specification Value
GPU name no iGPU left arrow Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU frequency left arrow 0.35 GHz
GPU (Turbo) No turbo left arrow 1.20 GHz
Execution units left arrow 24
Shader left arrow 192
Max. GPU Memory -- left arrow 64 GB
Max. displays left arrow 3
Generation left arrow 9.5
DirectX Version left arrow 12
Technology left arrow 14 nm
Release date left arrow Q4/2017

Hardware codec support

Let's compare the support of video codecs between Intel Core i3-10100F and Intel Core i9-9900K. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.

Specification Value
h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No left arrow Decode / Encode
h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No left arrow Decode / Encode
h264 No left arrow Decode / Encode
VP9 No left arrow Decode / Encode
VP8 No left arrow Decode / Encode
AV1 No left arrow No
AVC No left arrow Decode / Encode
VC-1 No left arrow Decode
JPEG No left arrow Decode / Encode

Memory & PCIe

To choose the best model between Intel Core i3-10100F and Intel Core i9-9900K you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.

Specification Value
Memory type DDR4-2666 left arrow DDR4-2666
Max. Memory 128 GB left arrow 128 GB
ECC No left arrow No
Memory channels 2 left arrow 2
PCIe version 3.0 left arrow 3.0
PCIe lanes 16 left arrow 16

Encryption

AES-NI encryption support for CPUs Intel Core i3-10100F and Intel Core i9-9900K.

Specification Value
AES-NI Yes left arrow Yes

Thermal Management

Let's find out what TDP value would be better for Intel Core i3-10100F or Intel Core i9-9900K? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.

Specification Value
TDP (PL1) 65 W left arrow 95 W
TDP (PL2) -- left arrow 119 W / 28 s
Tjunction max. 100 °C left arrow 100 °C

Technical details

Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for Intel Core i3-10100F and Intel Core i9-9900K CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.

Specification Value
Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
ISA extensions SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2
L3-Cache 6.00 MB left arrow 16.00 MB
Architecture Comet Lake S left arrow Coffee Lake S Refresh
Technology 14 nm left arrow 14 nm
Socket LGA 1200 left arrow LGA 1151-2
Release date Q4/2020 left arrow Q4/2018

Devices using this processor

List of devices based on Intel Core i3-10100F and Intel Core i9-9900K.

Specification Value
Used in Unknown left arrow Memory PC Intel i9-9900KMultimedia Office PC Intel Core i9 9900KCorsair ONE i160 Kompakter Gaming-PC Intel Core i9-9900K

Benchmarks

Real tests Intel Core i3-10100F vs Intel Core i9-9900K

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the newest instalment of the most popular CPU Rendering Benchmark Single-Core Cinebench.

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the newest instalment of the most popular CPU Rendering Benchmark Multi-Core Cinebench.

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is based on Cinema 4 Suite.

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

It is the new version of the benchmark which is developed on the basis of Cinebench R15 (both versions are operated on the basis of Cinema 4 - the most popular 3D modeling software).

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

The latter is used for creation of 3D models and forms.

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 can be used for multi-core processor performance benchmark testing.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 benchmark is the newest software suit.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 software suite shows benchmark testing results of the memory performance and speed of the multi-core processor.

Latest comparisons