Русский 
Deutsch 
Português 
Italiano 
Français 
日本語 
Español 
Polski 
简体中文 
한국어 
Differences
Top features of Intel Celeron N4120
-
Performance per watt6 W
38 W
About 6.33 0.97 times less performance per watt
Top features of Intel Atom C5315
-
Higher clock speed2.40 GHz
1.10 GHz
Around 54% better clock speed
Specifications
Complete list of technical specificationsCPU generation and family
Let's find out which one of Intel Celeron N4120 and Intel Atom C5315 is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Name |
Intel Celeron N4120
Intel Atom C5315
|
| Segment |
Mobile
Mobile
|
| Family |
Intel Celeron
Intel Atom
|
| Generation |
9
3
|
| CPU group |
Intel Celeron J4000/N4000/N5000
Intel Atom CE5300
|
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
In this block we are going to compare Intel Celeron N4120 vs Intel Atom C5315 by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Frequency |
1.10 GHz
2.40 GHz
|
| Overclocking |
No
No
|
| Core architecture |
normal
normal
|
Internal Graphics
Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in Intel Celeron N4120 and Intel Atom C5315 along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| GPU name |
Intel UHD Graphics 600
no iGPU
|
| GPU frequency |
0.20 GHz
|
| GPU (Turbo) |
0.70 GHz
No turbo
|
| Execution units |
12
|
| Shader |
96
|
| Max. GPU Memory |
8 GB
--
|
| Max. displays |
3
|
| Generation |
9.5
|
| Technology |
14 nm
|
| Release date |
Q4/2017
|
Hardware codec support
Let's compare the support of video codecs between Intel Celeron N4120 and Intel Atom C5315. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| h265 / HEVC (8 bit) |
Decode / Encode
No
|
| h265 / HEVC (10 bit) |
Decode / Encode
No
|
| h264 |
Decode / Encode
No
|
| VP9 |
Decode / Encode
No
|
| VP8 |
Decode / Encode
No
|
| AV1 |
No
No
|
| AVC |
Decode / Encode
No
|
| VC-1 |
Decode
No
|
| JPEG |
Decode / Encode
No
|
Memory & PCIe
To choose the best model between Intel Celeron N4120 and Intel Atom C5315 you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Memory type |
DDR4-2400
DDR4-2400
|
| Max. Memory |
256 GB
|
| ECC |
No
Yes
|
| Memory channels |
2
2 (Dual Channel)
|
Thermal Management
Let's find out what TDP value would be better for Intel Celeron N4120 or Intel Atom C5315? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| TDP (PL1) |
6 W
38 W
|
| Tjunction max. |
--
100 \xc2\xb0C
|
Technical details
Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for Intel Celeron N4120 and Intel Atom C5315 CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Instruction set (ISA) |
x86-64 (64 bit)
x86-64 (64 bit)
|
| Virtualization |
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Unknown
|
| ISA extensions |
SSE4.1, SSE4.2
Unknown
|
| L2-Cache |
--
9.00 MB
|
| L3-Cache |
4.00 MB
--
|
| Architecture |
Gemini Lake
Berryville
|
| Technology |
10 nm
32 nm
|
| Socket |
BGA 1090
BGA 2106
|
| Release date |
Q4/2019
Q2/2022
|
