Intel Celeron N4100
MediaTek MT8117
Select graphics card
Select graphics card

Comparing Intel Celeron N4100 vs MediaTek MT8117

Comparison of video cards Intel Celeron N4100 vs MediaTek MT8117 in benchmarks and specifications.

Differences

Intel Celeron N4100

Top features of Intel Celeron N4100

Report a bug
MediaTek MT8117

Top features of MediaTek MT8117

Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    1.20 GHz left arrow 1.10 GHz
    Around 8% better clock speed

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications

CPU generation and family

Let's find out which one of Intel Celeron N4100 and MediaTek MT8117 is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.

Specification Value
Name Intel Celeron N4100 left arrow MediaTek MT8117
Segment Mobile left arrow Mobile
Family Intel Celeron left arrow Mediatek MT-Serie
Generation 9 left arrow 1
CPU group Intel Celeron J4000/N4000/N5000 left arrow MediaTek MT81xx A7

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In this block we are going to compare Intel Celeron N4100 vs MediaTek MT8117 by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.

Specification Value
Frequency 1.10 GHz left arrow 1.20 GHz
Overclocking No left arrow No
Core architecture normal left arrow normal

Internal Graphics

Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in Intel Celeron N4100 and MediaTek MT8117 along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.

Specification Value
GPU name Intel UHD Graphics 600 left arrow PowerVR SGX544
GPU frequency 0.20 GHz left arrow 0.16 GHz
GPU (Turbo) 0.70 GHz left arrow 0.16 GHz
Execution units 12 left arrow 2
Shader 96 left arrow 4
Max. GPU Memory 8 GB left arrow --
Max. displays 3 left arrow 1
Generation 9.5 left arrow
Technology 14 nm left arrow 45nm
Release date Q4/2017 left arrow Q1/2010

Hardware codec support

Let's compare the support of video codecs between Intel Celeron N4100 and MediaTek MT8117. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.

Specification Value
h265 / HEVC (8 bit) Decode / Encode left arrow No
h265 / HEVC (10 bit) Decode / Encode left arrow No
h264 Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
VP9 Decode / Encode left arrow No
VP8 Decode / Encode left arrow Decode
AV1 No left arrow No
AVC Decode / Encode left arrow No
VC-1 Decode left arrow No
JPEG Decode / Encode left arrow No

Memory & PCIe

To choose the best model between Intel Celeron N4100 and MediaTek MT8117 you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.

Specification Value
Max. Memory 8 GB left arrow
ECC No left arrow No
Memory channels 2 left arrow 0

Thermal Management

Let's find out what TDP value would be better for Intel Celeron N4100 or MediaTek MT8117? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.

Specification Value
TDP (PL1) 6 W left arrow

Technical details

Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for Intel Celeron N4100 and MediaTek MT8117 CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.

Specification Value
Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow ARMv7-A32 (32 bit)
Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d left arrow None
ISA extensions SSE4.1, SSE4.2 left arrow
L3-Cache 4.00 MB left arrow --
Architecture Gemini Lake left arrow Cortex-A7
Technology 10 nm left arrow 28 nm
Socket BGA 1090 left arrow N/A
Release date Q4/2017 left arrow Q2/2014

Benchmarks

Real tests Intel Celeron N4100 vs MediaTek MT8117

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

This test serves for determining the performance of integrated graphics in Intel and AMD processors.

Latest comparisons