Differences

Top features of Intel Celeron G5925
-
Higher clock speed3.60 GHz
3.50 GHz
Around -3% better clock speed

Top features of AMD Athlon 320GE
-
Performance per watt35 W
58 W
About 0.6 times less performance per watt
Specifications
Complete list of technical specificationsCPU generation and family
Let's find out which one of Intel Celeron G5925 and AMD Athlon 320GE is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.
Specification | Value |
---|---|
Name |
Intel Celeron G5925
![]() |
Segment |
Desktop / Server
![]() |
Family |
Intel Celeron
![]() |
Generation |
9
![]() |
CPU group |
Intel Celeron G5000
![]() |
Predecessor |
Intel Celeron G5920
![]() |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
In this block we are going to compare Intel Celeron G5925 vs AMD Athlon 320GE by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.
Specification | Value |
---|---|
Frequency |
3.60 GHz
![]() |
Overclocking |
No
![]() |
Core architecture |
normal
![]() |
Internal Graphics
Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in Intel Celeron G5925 and AMD Athlon 320GE along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.
Specification | Value |
---|---|
GPU name |
Intel HD Graphics 610
![]() |
GPU frequency |
0.35 GHz
![]() |
GPU (Turbo) |
1.05 GHz
![]() |
Execution units |
12
![]() |
Shader |
96
![]() |
Max. GPU Memory |
32 GB
![]() |
Max. displays |
3
![]() |
Generation |
9.5
![]() |
Technology |
14 nm
![]() |
Release date |
Q3/2016
![]() |
Hardware codec support
Let's compare the support of video codecs between Intel Celeron G5925 and AMD Athlon 320GE. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.
Specification | Value |
---|---|
h265 / HEVC (8 bit) |
Decode / Encode
![]() |
h265 / HEVC (10 bit) |
Decode / Encode
![]() |
h264 |
Decode / Encode
![]() |
VP9 |
Decode / Encode
![]() |
VP8 |
Decode / Encode
![]() |
AV1 |
No
![]() |
AVC |
Decode / Encode
![]() |
VC-1 |
Decode
![]() |
JPEG |
Decode / Encode
![]() |
Memory & PCIe
To choose the best model between Intel Celeron G5925 and AMD Athlon 320GE you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.
Specification | Value |
---|---|
Memory type |
DDR4-2666
![]() |
Max. Memory |
128 GB
![]() |
ECC |
Yes
![]() |
Memory channels |
2
![]() |
Thermal Management
Let's find out what TDP value would be better for Intel Celeron G5925 or AMD Athlon 320GE? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.
Specification | Value |
---|---|
TDP (PL1) |
58 W
![]() |
Tjunction max. |
100 °C
![]() |
Technical details
Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for Intel Celeron G5925 and AMD Athlon 320GE CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.
Specification | Value |
---|---|
Instruction set (ISA) |
x86-64 (64 bit)
![]() |
Virtualization |
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
![]() |
ISA extensions |
SSE4.1, SSE4.2
![]() |
L2-Cache |
--
![]() |
L3-Cache |
4.00 MB
![]() |
Architecture |
Comet Lake S
![]() |
Technology |
14 nm
![]() |
Socket |
LGA 1200
![]() |
Release date |
Q3/2020
![]() |