Intel Celeron G1610
Intel Celeron G1820
Select graphics card
Select graphics card

Comparing Intel Celeron G1610 vs Intel Celeron G1820

Comparison of video cards Intel Celeron G1610 vs Intel Celeron G1820 in benchmarks and specifications.

Differences

Intel Celeron G1610

Top features of Intel Celeron G1610

Report a bug
Intel Celeron G1820

Top features of Intel Celeron G1820

Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    2.70 GHz left arrow 2.60 GHz
    Around 4% better clock speed
  • Performance per watt
    53 W left arrow 55 W
    About 0.96 times less performance per watt

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications

CPU generation and family

Let's find out which one of Intel Celeron G1610 and Intel Celeron G1820 is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.

Specification Value
Name Intel Celeron G1610 left arrow Intel Celeron G1820
Segment Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
Family Intel Celeron left arrow Intel Celeron
Generation 3 left arrow 3
CPU group Intel Celeron G1000 left arrow Intel Celeron G1000

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In this block we are going to compare Intel Celeron G1610 vs Intel Celeron G1820 by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.

Specification Value
Frequency 2.60 GHz left arrow 2.70 GHz
CPU Cores 2 left arrow 2
Turbo (1 Core) No turbo left arrow No turbo
CPU Threads 2 left arrow 2
Turbo (2 Cores) No turbo left arrow No turbo
Hyperthreading No left arrow No
Overclocking No left arrow No
Core architecture normal left arrow normal

Internal Graphics

Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in Intel Celeron G1610 and Intel Celeron G1820 along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.

Specification Value
GPU name Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1) left arrow Intel HD Graphics (Haswell GT1)
GPU frequency 0.65 GHz left arrow 0.35 GHz
GPU (Turbo) 1.05 GHz left arrow 1.05 GHz
Execution units 6 left arrow 10
Shader 48 left arrow 80
Max. displays 3 left arrow 3
Generation 7 left arrow 7.5
DirectX Version 11.0 left arrow 11.1
Technology 22 nm left arrow 22 nm
Release date Q4/2012 left arrow Q4/2012

Hardware codec support

Let's compare the support of video codecs between Intel Celeron G1610 and Intel Celeron G1820. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.

Specification Value
h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No left arrow No
h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No left arrow No
h264 Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
VP9 No left arrow No
VP8 No left arrow No
AV1 No left arrow No
AVC Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
VC-1 Decode left arrow Decode
JPEG Decode left arrow Decode

Memory & PCIe

To choose the best model between Intel Celeron G1610 and Intel Celeron G1820 you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.

Specification Value
Memory type DDR3-1333 left arrow DDR3-1333
ECC Yes left arrow Yes
Memory channels 2 left arrow 2
PCIe version 2.0 left arrow 3.0
PCIe lanes 16 left arrow 16

Encryption

AES-NI encryption support for CPUs Intel Celeron G1610 and Intel Celeron G1820.

Specification Value
AES-NI Yes left arrow Yes

Thermal Management

Let's find out what TDP value would be better for Intel Celeron G1610 or Intel Celeron G1820? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.

Specification Value
TDP (PL1) 55 W left arrow 53 W

Technical details

Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for Intel Celeron G1610 and Intel Celeron G1820 CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.

Specification Value
Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
ISA extensions SSE4.1, SSE4.2 left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2
L3-Cache 2.00 MB left arrow 2.00 MB
Architecture Ivy Bridge S left arrow Ivy Bridge S
Technology 22 nm left arrow 22 nm
Socket LGA 1155 left arrow LGA 1150
Release date Q1/2013 left arrow Q1/2014

Devices using this processor

List of devices based on Intel Celeron G1610 and Intel Celeron G1820.

Specification Value
Used in Unknown left arrow Unknown

Benchmarks

Real tests Intel Celeron G1610 vs Intel Celeron G1820

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

The latter is used for creation of 3D models and forms.

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 can be used for multi-core processor performance benchmark testing.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 benchmark is the newest software suit.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 software suite shows benchmark testing results of the memory performance and speed of the multi-core processor.

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

This test serves for determining the performance of integrated graphics in Intel and AMD processors.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3 is the benchmark for Intel and AMD 64-bit processors.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3 benchmark supports AMD and Intel multi-core processors.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

This synthetic test will help you determine the real computing power of a single core in the central processing unit.

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

It tests entire and overall performance of the central processing unit (mathematical calculations, compression and decompression speed, 2D&3D graphic tests).

Latest comparisons