Русский 
Deutsch 
Português 
Italiano 
Français 
日本語 
Español 
Polski 
简体中文 
한국어 
Differences
Top features of Intel Celeron 2950M
-
Higher clock speed2.00 GHz
1.20 GHz
Around -67% better clock speed
Top features of Intel Atom CE5315
Specifications
Complete list of technical specificationsCPU generation and family
Let's find out which one of Intel Celeron 2950M and Intel Atom CE5315 is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Name |
Intel Celeron 2950M
Intel Atom CE5315
|
| Segment |
Mobile
Mobile
|
| Family |
Intel Celeron
Intel Atom
|
| Generation |
4
3
|
| CPU group |
Intel Celeron 2000
Intel Atom CE5300
|
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
In this block we are going to compare Intel Celeron 2950M vs Intel Atom CE5315 by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Frequency |
2.00 GHz
1.20 GHz
|
| Overclocking |
No
No
|
| Core architecture |
normal
normal
|
Internal Graphics
Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in Intel Celeron 2950M and Intel Atom CE5315 along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| GPU name |
Intel HD Graphics (Haswell GT1)
no iGPU
|
| GPU frequency |
0.40 GHz
|
| GPU (Turbo) |
1.10 GHz
No turbo
|
| Execution units |
10
|
| Shader |
80
|
| Max. displays |
3
|
| Generation |
7.5
|
| Technology |
22 nm
|
| Release date |
Q4/2012
|
Hardware codec support
Let's compare the support of video codecs between Intel Celeron 2950M and Intel Atom CE5315. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| h265 / HEVC (8 bit) |
No
No
|
| h265 / HEVC (10 bit) |
No
No
|
| h264 |
Decode / Encode
No
|
| VP9 |
No
No
|
| VP8 |
No
No
|
| AV1 |
No
No
|
| AVC |
Decode / Encode
No
|
| VC-1 |
Decode
No
|
| JPEG |
Decode
No
|
Memory & PCIe
To choose the best model between Intel Celeron 2950M and Intel Atom CE5315 you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Memory type |
DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM
DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM
|
| ECC |
No
Yes
|
| Memory channels |
2
1 (Single Channel)
|
Thermal Management
Let's find out what TDP value would be better for Intel Celeron 2950M or Intel Atom CE5315? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| TDP (PL1) |
15 W
15 W
|
| TDP down |
--
10 W
|
Technical details
Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for Intel Celeron 2950M and Intel Atom CE5315 CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Instruction set (ISA) |
x86-64 (64 bit)
x86-64 (64 bit)
|
| Virtualization |
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Unknown
|
| ISA extensions |
SSE4.1, SSE4.2
Unknown
|
| L2-Cache |
--
0.50 MB
|
| L3-Cache |
2.00 MB
--
|
| Architecture |
Haswell U
Berryville
|
| Technology |
22 nm
32 nm
|
| Socket |
BGA 1168
BGA 1283
|
| Release date |
Q4/2013
Q1/2013
|
