Intel Atom Z3560
Apple A8X
Select graphics card
Select graphics card

Comparing Apple A8X vs Intel Atom Z3560

Comparison of video cards Apple A8X vs Intel Atom Z3560 in benchmarks and specifications.

Differences

Intel Atom Z3560

Top features of Intel Atom Z3560

Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    1.83 GHz left arrow 1.50 GHz
    Around -22% better clock speed
Apple A8X

Top features of Apple A8X

Report a bug

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications

CPU generation and family

Let's find out which one of Intel Atom Z3560 and Apple A8X is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.

Specification Value
Name Intel Atom Z3560 left arrow Apple A8X
Family Intel Atom left arrow Apple A series
CPU group Intel Atom Z3500 left arrow Apple A8/A8X
Segment Mobile left arrow Mobile
Generation 5 left arrow 8
Successor -- left arrow Apple A9X

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In this block we are going to compare Intel Atom Z3560 vs Apple A8X by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.

Specification Value
Core architecture normal left arrow normal
Overclocking No left arrow No
Frequency 1.83 GHz left arrow 1.50 GHz

Internal Graphics

Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in Intel Atom Z3560 and Apple A8X along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.

Specification Value
GPU name PowerVR G6430 left arrow Apple A8X
GPU frequency 0.46 GHz left arrow 0.45 GHz
GPU (Turbo) 0.53 GHz left arrow No turbo
Execution units 16 left arrow 8
Shader 128 left arrow 256
Max. GPU Memory -- left arrow 4 GB
Max. displays 2 left arrow 1
Generation left arrow 5
Technology 28 nm left arrow 20 nm
Release date Q3/2013 left arrow Q3/2014

Hardware codec support

Let's compare the support of video codecs between Intel Atom Z3560 and Apple A8X. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.

Specification Value
h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No left arrow No
h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No left arrow No
h264 No left arrow Decode
VP8 No left arrow No
VP9 No left arrow No
AV1 No left arrow No
AVC No left arrow Decode
VC-1 No left arrow Decode
JPEG No left arrow Decode / Encode

Memory & PCIe

To choose the best model between Intel Atom Z3560 and Apple A8X you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.

Specification Value
Memory type LPDDR3-1600 left arrow LPDDR3-1600
Max. Memory 4 GB left arrow 4 GB
Memory channels 2 (Dual Channel) left arrow 2
ECC No left arrow No

Thermal Management

Let's find out what TDP value would be better for Intel Atom Z3560 or Apple A8X? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.

Specification Value
TDP (PL1) left arrow 8 W
Tjunction max. 90 \xc2\xb0C left arrow --

Technical details

Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for Intel Atom Z3560 and Apple A8X CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.

Specification Value
Technology 22 nm left arrow 20 nm
Socket FC-MB5T1064 left arrow N/A
L2-Cache 2.00 MB left arrow 2.00 MB
L3-Cache -- left arrow 4.00 MB
Architecture Moorefield left arrow A8
Virtualization Intel VT-x left arrow None
Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
ISA extensions MMX, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, left arrow
Release date Q2/2014 left arrow Q3/2014

Benchmarks

Real tests Intel Atom Z3560 vs Apple A8X

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

This test serves for determining the performance of integrated graphics in Intel and AMD processors.

Latest comparisons