Intel Atom E3825
AMD GX-210JA
Select graphics card
Select graphics card

Comparing AMD GX-210JA vs Intel Atom E3825

Comparison of video cards AMD GX-210JA vs Intel Atom E3825 in benchmarks and specifications.

Differences

Intel Atom E3825

Top features of Intel Atom E3825

Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    1.33 GHz left arrow 1.00 GHz
    Around -33% better clock speed
AMD GX-210JA

Top features of AMD GX-210JA

Report a bug

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications

CPU generation and family

Let's find out which one of Intel Atom E3825 and AMD GX-210JA is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.

Specification Value
Name Intel Atom E3825 left arrow AMD GX-210JA
Segment Mobile left arrow Mobile
Family Intel Atom left arrow AMD G
Generation 4 left arrow 1
CPU group Intel Atom E3800 left arrow AMD GX 1st Gen.

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In this block we are going to compare Intel Atom E3825 vs AMD GX-210JA by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.

Specification Value
Frequency 1.33 GHz left arrow 1.00 GHz
Overclocking No left arrow Yes
Core architecture normal left arrow normal

Internal Graphics

Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in Intel Atom E3825 and AMD GX-210JA along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.

Specification Value
GPU name Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) left arrow AMD Radeon HD 8180
GPU frequency 0.53 GHz left arrow 0.23 GHz
GPU (Turbo) 0.53 GHz left arrow No turbo
Execution units 4 left arrow 2
Shader 32 left arrow 128
Max. GPU Memory 8 GB left arrow 2 GB
Max. displays 2 left arrow 2
Generation 7 left arrow 5
Technology 22 nm left arrow 28 nm
Release date Q3/2013 left arrow Q2/2013

Hardware codec support

Let's compare the support of video codecs between Intel Atom E3825 and AMD GX-210JA. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.

Specification Value
h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No left arrow No
h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No left arrow No
h264 Decode / Encode left arrow Decode
VP9 No left arrow No
VP8 No left arrow No
AV1 No left arrow No
AVC Decode / Encode left arrow Decode
VC-1 Decode left arrow Decode
JPEG Decode left arrow Decode / Encode

Memory & PCIe

To choose the best model between Intel Atom E3825 and AMD GX-210JA you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.

Specification Value
Memory type DDR3L-1066 SO-DIMM left arrow DDR3L-1066 SO-DIMM
ECC No left arrow No
Memory channels 1 left arrow 2 (Dual Channel)

Thermal Management

Let's find out what TDP value would be better for Intel Atom E3825 or AMD GX-210JA? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.

Specification Value
TDP (PL1) 6 W left arrow 6 W

Technical details

Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for Intel Atom E3825 and AMD GX-210JA CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.

Specification Value
Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT left arrow AMD-V
ISA extensions SSE4.1, SSE4.2 left arrow SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4
L2-Cache -- left arrow 1.00 MB
L3-Cache 1.00 MB left arrow --
Architecture Bay Trail left arrow Temash (Jaguar)
Technology 22 nm left arrow 28 nm
Socket BGA 1170 left arrow FT3
Release date Q4/2013 left arrow Q2/2013

Benchmarks

Real tests Intel Atom E3825 vs AMD GX-210JA

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

This test serves for determining the performance of integrated graphics in Intel and AMD processors.

Latest comparisons