Русский 
Deutsch 
Português 
Italiano 
Français 
日本語 
Español 
Polski 
简体中文 
한국어 
Differences
Top features of Intel Atom CE5315
-
Performance per watt15 W
57 W
About 3.8 0.97 times less performance per watt
Top features of Intel Core i7-4940MX
-
Higher clock speed3.10 GHz
1.20 GHz
Around 61% better clock speed
Specifications
Complete list of technical specificationsCPU generation and family
Let's find out which one of Intel Atom CE5315 and Intel Core i7-4940MX is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Name |
Intel Atom CE5315
Intel Core i7-4940MX
|
| Family |
Intel Atom
Intel Core i7 Extreme Edition
|
| CPU group |
Intel Atom CE5300
Intel Core i 4000M/4000H
|
| Segment |
Mobile
Mobile
|
| Generation |
3
4
|
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
In this block we are going to compare Intel Atom CE5315 vs Intel Core i7-4940MX by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Core architecture |
normal
normal
|
| Overclocking |
No
Yes
|
| Frequency |
1.20 GHz
3.10 GHz
|
Internal Graphics
Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in Intel Atom CE5315 and Intel Core i7-4940MX along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| GPU name |
no iGPU
Intel HD Graphics 4600
|
| GPU frequency |
0.40 GHz
|
| GPU (Turbo) |
No turbo
1.35 GHz
|
| Execution units |
20
|
| Shader |
160
|
| Max. GPU Memory |
--
2 GB
|
| Max. displays |
3
|
| Generation |
7.5
|
| Technology |
22 nm
|
| Release date |
Q2/2013
|
Hardware codec support
Let's compare the support of video codecs between Intel Atom CE5315 and Intel Core i7-4940MX. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| h265 / HEVC (8 bit) |
No
No
|
| h265 / HEVC (10 bit) |
No
No
|
| h264 |
No
Decode / Encode
|
| VP8 |
No
No
|
| VP9 |
No
No
|
| AV1 |
No
No
|
| AVC |
No
Decode / Encode
|
| VC-1 |
No
Decode
|
| JPEG |
No
Decode
|
Memory & PCIe
To choose the best model between Intel Atom CE5315 and Intel Core i7-4940MX you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Memory type |
DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM
DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM
|
| Memory channels |
1 (Single Channel)
4
|
| ECC |
Yes
No
|
Thermal Management
Let's find out what TDP value would be better for Intel Atom CE5315 or Intel Core i7-4940MX? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| TDP (PL1) |
15 W
57 W
|
| TDP down |
10 W
--
|
Technical details
Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for Intel Atom CE5315 and Intel Core i7-4940MX CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Technology |
32 nm
22 nm
|
| Socket |
BGA 1283
PGA 946
|
| L2-Cache |
0.50 MB
--
|
| L3-Cache |
--
8.00 MB
|
| Architecture |
Berryville
Haswell H
|
| Virtualization |
Unknown
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
|
| Instruction set (ISA) |
x86-64 (64 bit)
x86-64 (64 bit)
|
| ISA extensions |
Unknown
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2
|
| Release date |
Q1/2013
Q4/2013
|
