Intel Atom CE5315
Intel Celeron J3060
Select graphics card
Select graphics card

Comparing Intel Atom CE5315 vs Intel Celeron J3060

Comparison of video cards Intel Atom CE5315 vs Intel Celeron J3060 in benchmarks and specifications.

Differences

Intel Atom CE5315

Top features of Intel Atom CE5315

Report a bug
Intel Celeron J3060

Top features of Intel Celeron J3060

Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    1.60 GHz left arrow 1.20 GHz
    Around 25% better clock speed
  • Performance per watt
    6 W left arrow 15 W
    About 0.4 times less performance per watt

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications

CPU generation and family

Let's find out which one of Intel Atom CE5315 and Intel Celeron J3060 is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.

Specification Value
Name Intel Atom CE5315 left arrow Intel Celeron J3060
Family Intel Atom left arrow Intel Celeron
CPU group Intel Atom CE5300 left arrow Intel Celeron J3000/N3000
Segment Mobile left arrow Mobile
Generation 3 left arrow 8

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In this block we are going to compare Intel Atom CE5315 vs Intel Celeron J3060 by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.

Specification Value
Core architecture normal left arrow normal
Overclocking No left arrow No
Frequency 1.20 GHz left arrow 1.60 GHz

Internal Graphics

Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in Intel Atom CE5315 and Intel Celeron J3060 along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.

Specification Value
GPU name no iGPU left arrow Intel HD Graphics 400
GPU frequency left arrow 0.32 GHz
GPU (Turbo) No turbo left arrow 0.70 GHz
Execution units left arrow 12
Shader left arrow 96
Max. GPU Memory -- left arrow 8 GB
Max. displays left arrow 3
Generation left arrow 8
Technology left arrow 14 nm
Release date left arrow Q1/2015

Hardware codec support

Let's compare the support of video codecs between Intel Atom CE5315 and Intel Celeron J3060. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.

Specification Value
h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No left arrow No
h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No left arrow No
h264 No left arrow Decode / Encode
VP8 No left arrow Decode
VP9 No left arrow No
AV1 No left arrow No
AVC No left arrow Decode / Encode
VC-1 No left arrow Decode
JPEG No left arrow Decode

Memory & PCIe

To choose the best model between Intel Atom CE5315 and Intel Celeron J3060 you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.

Specification Value
Memory type DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM left arrow DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM
Memory channels 1 (Single Channel) left arrow 2
ECC Yes left arrow No

Thermal Management

Let's find out what TDP value would be better for Intel Atom CE5315 or Intel Celeron J3060? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.

Specification Value
TDP (PL1) 15 W left arrow 6 W
TDP down 10 W left arrow --

Technical details

Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for Intel Atom CE5315 and Intel Celeron J3060 CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.

Specification Value
Technology 32 nm left arrow 14 nm
Socket BGA 1283 left arrow BGA 1170
L2-Cache 0.50 MB left arrow --
L3-Cache -- left arrow 2.00 MB
Architecture Berryville left arrow Braswell
Virtualization Unknown left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT
Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
ISA extensions Unknown left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2
Release date Q1/2013 left arrow Q1/2016

Latest comparisons