Русский 
Deutsch 
Português 
Italiano 
Français 
日本語 
Español 
Polski 
简体中文 
한국어 
Differences
Top features of Intel Atom CE5315
-
Performance per watt15 W
37 W
About 2.47 0.97 times less performance per watt
Top features of Intel Celeron 2970M
-
Higher clock speed2.20 GHz
1.20 GHz
Around 45% better clock speed
Specifications
Complete list of technical specificationsCPU generation and family
Let's find out which one of Intel Atom CE5315 and Intel Celeron 2970M is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Name |
Intel Atom CE5315
Intel Celeron 2970M
|
| Family |
Intel Atom
Intel Celeron
|
| CPU group |
Intel Atom CE5300
Intel Celeron 2000
|
| Segment |
Mobile
Mobile
|
| Generation |
3
4
|
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
In this block we are going to compare Intel Atom CE5315 vs Intel Celeron 2970M by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Core architecture |
normal
normal
|
| Overclocking |
No
No
|
| Frequency |
1.20 GHz
2.20 GHz
|
Internal Graphics
Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in Intel Atom CE5315 and Intel Celeron 2970M along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| GPU name |
no iGPU
Intel HD Graphics (Haswell GT1)
|
| GPU frequency |
0.40 GHz
|
| GPU (Turbo) |
No turbo
1.10 GHz
|
| Execution units |
10
|
| Shader |
80
|
| Max. displays |
3
|
| Generation |
7.5
|
| Technology |
22 nm
|
| Release date |
Q4/2012
|
Hardware codec support
Let's compare the support of video codecs between Intel Atom CE5315 and Intel Celeron 2970M. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| h265 / HEVC (8 bit) |
No
No
|
| h265 / HEVC (10 bit) |
No
No
|
| h264 |
No
Decode / Encode
|
| VP8 |
No
No
|
| VP9 |
No
No
|
| AV1 |
No
No
|
| AVC |
No
Decode / Encode
|
| VC-1 |
No
Decode
|
| JPEG |
No
Decode
|
Memory & PCIe
To choose the best model between Intel Atom CE5315 and Intel Celeron 2970M you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Memory type |
DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM
DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM
|
| Memory channels |
1 (Single Channel)
2
|
| ECC |
Yes
No
|
Thermal Management
Let's find out what TDP value would be better for Intel Atom CE5315 or Intel Celeron 2970M? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| TDP (PL1) |
15 W
37 W
|
| TDP down |
10 W
--
|
Technical details
Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for Intel Atom CE5315 and Intel Celeron 2970M CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Technology |
32 nm
22 nm
|
| Socket |
BGA 1283
BGA 1168
|
| L2-Cache |
0.50 MB
--
|
| L3-Cache |
--
2.00 MB
|
| Architecture |
Berryville
Haswell U
|
| Virtualization |
Unknown
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
|
| Instruction set (ISA) |
x86-64 (64 bit)
x86-64 (64 bit)
|
| ISA extensions |
Unknown
SSE4.1, SSE4.2
|
| Release date |
Q1/2013
Q2/2014
|
