Русский 
Deutsch 
Português 
Italiano 
Français 
日本語 
Español 
Polski 
简体中文 
한국어 
Differences
Top features of Intel Atom C5325
-
Performance per watt41 W
180 W
About 4.39 0.97 times less performance per watt
Top features of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
-
Higher clock speed3.50 GHz
2.40 GHz
Around 31% better clock speed
Specifications
Complete list of technical specificationsCPU generation and family
Let's find out which one of Intel Atom C5325 and AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Name |
Intel Atom C5325
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
|
| Family |
Intel Atom
AMD Ryzen
|
| CPU group |
Intel Atom C5000
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2000
|
| Segment |
Desktop / Server
Desktop / Server
|
| Generation |
6
2
|
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
In this block we are going to compare Intel Atom C5325 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Core architecture |
normal
normal
|
| Overclocking |
No
Yes
|
| Frequency |
2.40 GHz
3.50 GHz
|
Internal Graphics
Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in Intel Atom C5325 and AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| GPU name |
no iGPU
no iGPU
|
| GPU (Turbo) |
No turbo
No turbo
|
Hardware codec support
Let's compare the support of video codecs between Intel Atom C5325 and AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| h265 / HEVC (8 bit) |
No
No
|
| h265 / HEVC (10 bit) |
No
No
|
| h264 |
No
No
|
| VP8 |
No
No
|
| VP9 |
No
No
|
| AV1 |
No
No
|
| AVC |
No
No
|
| VC-1 |
No
No
|
| JPEG |
No
No
|
Memory & PCIe
To choose the best model between Intel Atom C5325 and AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Memory type |
DDR4-2933
DDR4-2933
|
| Max. Memory |
256 GB
|
| Memory channels |
2 (Dual Channel)
4
|
| ECC |
Yes
Yes
|
Thermal Management
Let's find out what TDP value would be better for Intel Atom C5325 or AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| TDP (PL1) |
41 W
180 W
|
| Tjunction max. |
100 \xc2\xb0C
--
|
Technical details
Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for Intel Atom C5325 and AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Technology |
10 nm
12 nm
|
| Socket |
BGA 2106
TR4 (SP3r2)
|
| L2-Cache |
9.00 MB
--
|
| L3-Cache |
--
32.00 MB
|
| Architecture |
Parker Ridge
Colfax (Zen+)
|
| Virtualization |
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
AMD-V, SVM
|
| Instruction set (ISA) |
x86-64 (64 bit)
x86-64 (64 bit)
|
| ISA extensions |
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, Intel QAT
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
|
| Release date |
Q2/2022
Q3/2018
|
