Intel Atom C5310
Intel Xeon Silver 4215
Select graphics card
Select graphics card

Comparing Intel Xeon Silver 4215 vs Intel Atom C5310

Comparison of video cards Intel Xeon Silver 4215 vs Intel Atom C5310 in benchmarks and specifications.

Differences

Intel Atom C5310

Top features of Intel Atom C5310

Report a bug
  • Performance per watt
    32 W left arrow 85 W
    About 2.66 0.97 times less performance per watt
Intel Xeon Silver 4215

Top features of Intel Xeon Silver 4215

Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    2.50 GHz left arrow 1.60 GHz
    Around 36% better clock speed

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications

CPU generation and family

Let's find out which one of Intel Atom C5310 and Intel Xeon Silver 4215 is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.

Specification Value
Name Intel Atom C5310 left arrow Intel Xeon Silver 4215
Family Intel Atom left arrow Intel Xeon Silver
CPU group Intel Atom C5000 left arrow Intel Xeon Silver 4200
Segment Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
Generation 6 left arrow 2

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In this block we are going to compare Intel Atom C5310 vs Intel Xeon Silver 4215 by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.

Specification Value
Core architecture normal left arrow normal
Overclocking No left arrow No
Frequency 1.60 GHz left arrow 2.50 GHz

Internal Graphics

Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in Intel Atom C5310 and Intel Xeon Silver 4215 along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.

Specification Value
GPU name no iGPU left arrow no iGPU
GPU (Turbo) No turbo left arrow No turbo

Hardware codec support

Let's compare the support of video codecs between Intel Atom C5310 and Intel Xeon Silver 4215. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.

Specification Value
h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No left arrow No
h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No left arrow No
h264 No left arrow No
VP8 No left arrow No
VP9 No left arrow No
AV1 No left arrow No
AVC No left arrow No
VC-1 No left arrow No
JPEG No left arrow No

Memory & PCIe

To choose the best model between Intel Atom C5310 and Intel Xeon Silver 4215 you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.

Specification Value
Memory type DDR4-2400 left arrow DDR4-2400
Max. Memory 256 GB left arrow
Memory channels 2 (Dual Channel) left arrow 6
ECC Yes left arrow Yes

Thermal Management

Let's find out what TDP value would be better for Intel Atom C5310 or Intel Xeon Silver 4215? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.

Specification Value
TDP (PL1) 32 W left arrow 85 W
Tjunction max. 100 \xc2\xb0C left arrow --

Technical details

Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for Intel Atom C5310 and Intel Xeon Silver 4215 CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.

Specification Value
Technology 10 nm left arrow 14 nm
Socket BGA 2106 left arrow LGA 3647
L2-Cache 9.00 MB left arrow --
L3-Cache -- left arrow 11.00 MB
Architecture Parker Ridge left arrow Cascade Lake
Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
ISA extensions SSE4.1, SSE4.2, Intel QAT left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512
Release date Q2/2022 left arrow Q2/2019

Latest comparisons