Русский 
Deutsch 
Português 
Italiano 
Français 
日本語 
Español 
Polski 
简体中文 
한국어 
Differences
Top features of Intel Atom C5310
Top features of AMD Opteron X3418
-
Higher clock speed2.80 GHz
1.60 GHz
Around 43% better clock speed -
Performance per watt15 W
32 W
About 0.47 times less performance per watt
Specifications
Complete list of technical specificationsCPU generation and family
Let's find out which one of Intel Atom C5310 and AMD Opteron X3418 is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Name |
Intel Atom C5310
AMD Opteron X3418
|
| Family |
Intel Atom
AMD Opteron
|
| CPU group |
Intel Atom C5000
AMD Opteron X3000
|
| Segment |
Desktop / Server
Desktop / Server
|
| Generation |
6
0
|
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
In this block we are going to compare Intel Atom C5310 vs AMD Opteron X3418 by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads |
4 / 4
4 / 4
|
| Core architecture |
normal
normal
|
| Cores |
4x
4x
|
| Hyperthreading / SMT |
No
No
|
| Overclocking |
No
No
|
| Frequency |
1.60 GHz
2.80 GHz
|
| Turbo Frequency (1 Core) |
--
3.20 GHz
|
Internal Graphics
Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in Intel Atom C5310 and AMD Opteron X3418 along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| GPU name |
no iGPU
AMD Radeon R7 - 384 (Toronto)
|
| GPU frequency |
0.80 GHz
|
| GPU (Turbo) |
No turbo
No turbo
|
| Execution units |
6
|
| Shader |
384
|
| Max. displays |
3
|
| Direct X |
--
0
|
Hardware codec support
Let's compare the support of video codecs between Intel Atom C5310 and AMD Opteron X3418. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| h265 / HEVC (8 bit) |
No
Decode
|
| h265 / HEVC (10 bit) |
No
No
|
| h264 |
No
Decode / Encode
|
| VP8 |
No
No
|
| VP9 |
No
No
|
| AV1 |
No
No
|
| AVC |
No
No
|
| VC-1 |
No
No
|
| JPEG |
No
Decode
|
Memory & PCIe
To choose the best model between Intel Atom C5310 and AMD Opteron X3418 you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Memory type |
DDR4-2400
DDR4-2400
|
| Max. Memory |
256 GB
|
| Memory channels |
2 (Dual Channel)
2 (Dual Channel)
|
| ECC |
Yes
Yes
|
| PCIe |
3.0 x 12
3 x 8
|
| AES-NI |
Yes
Yes
|
Thermal Management
Let's find out what TDP value would be better for Intel Atom C5310 or AMD Opteron X3418? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| TDP (PL1) |
32 W
15 W
|
| TDP up |
--
35 W
|
| TDP down |
--
12 W
|
| Tjunction max. |
100 \xc2\xb0C
--
|
Technical details
Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for Intel Atom C5310 and AMD Opteron X3418 CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Technology |
10 nm
28 nm
|
| Chip design |
Monolithic
|
| Socket |
BGA 2106
FP4
|
| L2-Cache |
9.00 MB
2.00 MB
|
| Architecture |
Parker Ridge
Toronto (Excavator)
|
| Operating systems |
Windows 10, Linux
Windows 10, Linux
|
| Virtualization |
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
AMD-V, AMD-Vt
|
| Instruction set (ISA) |
x86-64 (64 bit)
x86-64 (64 bit)
|
| ISA extensions |
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, Intel QAT
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2
|
| Release date |
Q2/2022
Q2/2015
|
| Part Number |
--
OX3418AAY43KA
|
| Documents |
Technical data sheet
--
|
