Русский 
Deutsch 
Português 
Italiano 
Français 
日本語 
Español 
Polski 
简体中文 
한국어 
Differences
Top features of Intel Atom C3950
-
More number of cores16
12
2 times more threads -
Performance per watt24 W
25 W
About 1.04 0.97 times less performance per watt
Top features of Intel Atom C3858
-
Higher clock speed2.00 GHz
1.70 GHz
Around 15% better clock speed
Specifications
Complete list of technical specificationsCPU generation and family
Let's find out which one of Intel Atom C3950 and Intel Atom C3858 is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Name |
Intel Atom C3950
Intel Atom C3858
|
| Segment |
Desktop / Server
Desktop / Server
|
| Family |
Intel Atom
Intel Atom
|
| Generation |
2
2
|
| CPU group |
Intel Atom C3000
Intel Atom C3000
|
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
In this block we are going to compare Intel Atom C3950 vs Intel Atom C3858 by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Frequency |
1.70 GHz
2.00 GHz
|
| CPU Cores |
16
12
|
| Turbo (1 Core) |
2.20 GHz
No turbo
|
| CPU Threads |
16
12
|
| Hyperthreading |
No
No
|
| Overclocking |
No
No
|
| Core architecture |
normal
normal
|
Internal Graphics
Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in Intel Atom C3950 and Intel Atom C3858 along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| GPU name |
no iGPU
no iGPU
|
| GPU (Turbo) |
No turbo
No turbo
|
Hardware codec support
Let's compare the support of video codecs between Intel Atom C3950 and Intel Atom C3858. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| h265 / HEVC (8 bit) |
No
No
|
| h265 / HEVC (10 bit) |
No
No
|
| h264 |
No
No
|
| VP9 |
No
No
|
| VP8 |
No
No
|
| AV1 |
No
No
|
| AVC |
No
No
|
| VC-1 |
No
No
|
| JPEG |
No
No
|
Memory & PCIe
To choose the best model between Intel Atom C3950 and Intel Atom C3858 you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Memory type |
DDR4-2400
DDR4-2400
|
| Max. Memory |
256 GB
256 GB
|
| ECC |
Yes
Yes
|
| Memory channels |
2
2
|
| PCIe version |
3.0
3.0
|
| PCIe lanes |
16
16
|
Encryption
AES-NI encryption support for CPUs Intel Atom C3950 and Intel Atom C3858.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| AES-NI |
Yes
Yes
|
Thermal Management
Let's find out what TDP value would be better for Intel Atom C3950 or Intel Atom C3858? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| TDP (PL1) |
24 W
25 W
|
| Tjunction max. |
100 °C
100 °C
|
Technical details
Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for Intel Atom C3950 and Intel Atom C3858 CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Instruction set (ISA) |
x86-64 (64 bit)
x86-64 (64 bit)
|
| Virtualization |
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
|
| ISA extensions |
SSE4.1, SSE4.2
SSE4.1, SSE4.2
|
| L2-Cache |
16.00 MB
12.00 MB
|
| Architecture |
Denverton
Denverton
|
| Technology |
14 nm
14 nm
|
| Socket |
BGA 1310
BGA 1310
|
| Release date |
Q3/2017
Q3/2017
|
Devices using this processor
List of devices based on Intel Atom C3950 and Intel Atom C3858.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Used in |
Unknown
Unknown
|
