Intel Atom C3830 VS Intel Xeon E5-2658 v3

Comparing Intel Atom C3830 vs Intel Xeon E5-2658 v3

Comparison of video cards Intel Atom C3830 vs Intel Xeon E5-2658 v3 in benchmarks and specifications.

Differences Specifications

Differences

Top features of Intel Atom C3830

Report a bug

Performance per watt

21.5 W 105 W

About 4.88 0.97 times less performance per watt

Top features of Intel Xeon E5-2658 v3

Report a bug

Higher clock speed

2.20 GHz 1.90 GHz

Around 14% better clock speed
Higher turbo clock speed

2.90 GHz 2.30 GHz

Around 21 % better overclocked clock speed

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications

Intel Atom C3830 Intel Xeon E5-2658 v3

CPU generation and family

Let's find out which one of Intel Atom C3830 and Intel Xeon E5-2658 v3 is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.

Specification	Value
Name	Intel Atom C3830 Intel Xeon E5-2658 v3
Segment	Desktop / Server Desktop / Server
Family	Intel Atom Intel Xeon E5
Generation	2 5
CPU group	Intel Atom C3000 Intel Xeon E5 v3

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In this block we are going to compare Intel Atom C3830 vs Intel Xeon E5-2658 v3 by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.

Specification	Value
Frequency	1.90 GHz 2.20 GHz
CPU Cores	12 12
Turbo (1 Core)	2.30 GHz 2.90 GHz
CPU Threads	12 24
Turbo (12 Cores)	2.30 GHz 2.50 GHz
Hyperthreading	No Yes
Overclocking	No No
Core architecture	normal normal

Internal Graphics

Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in Intel Atom C3830 and Intel Xeon E5-2658 v3 along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.

Specification	Value
GPU name	no iGPU no iGPU
GPU (Turbo)	No turbo No turbo

Hardware codec support

Let's compare the support of video codecs between Intel Atom C3830 and Intel Xeon E5-2658 v3. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.

Specification	Value
h265 / HEVC (8 bit)	No No
h265 / HEVC (10 bit)	No No
h264	No No
VP9	No No
VP8	No No
AV1	No No
AVC	No No
VC-1	No No
JPEG	No No

Memory & PCIe

To choose the best model between Intel Atom C3830 and Intel Xeon E5-2658 v3 you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.

Specification	Value
Memory type	DDR4-2133 DDR4-2133
Max. Memory	256 GB
ECC	Yes Yes
Memory channels	2 4
PCIe version	3.0 3.0
PCIe lanes	12 40

Encryption

AES-NI encryption support for CPUs Intel Atom C3830 and Intel Xeon E5-2658 v3.

Specification	Value
AES-NI	Yes Yes

Thermal Management

Let's find out what TDP value would be better for Intel Atom C3830 or Intel Xeon E5-2658 v3? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.

Specification	Value
TDP (PL1)	21.5 W 105 W
Tjunction max.	100 °C --

Technical details

Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for Intel Atom C3830 and Intel Xeon E5-2658 v3 CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.

Specification	Value
Instruction set (ISA)	x86-64 (64 bit) x86-64 (64 bit)
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
ISA extensions	SSE4.1, SSE4.2 SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2
L2-Cache	12.00 MB --
L3-Cache	-- 30.00 MB
Architecture	Denverton Haswell E
Technology	14 nm 22 nm
Socket	BGA 1310 LGA 2011-3
Release date	Q3/2017 Q3/2014